225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19394107)
1. An interactive multiblock approach to meshing the spine.
Kallemeyn NA; Tadepalli SC; Shivanna KH; Grosland NM
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Sep; 95(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 19394107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a C2-C7 cervical spine finite element model using specimen-specific flexibility data.
Kallemeyn N; Gandhi A; Kode S; Shivanna K; Smucker J; Grosland N
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jun; 32(5):482-9. PubMed ID: 20392660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine.
Wheeldon JA; Pintar FA; Knowles S; Yoganandan N
J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 16321642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cartilage thickness distribution affects computational model predictions of cervical spine facet contact parameters.
Womack W; Ayturk UM; Puttlitz CM
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jan; 133(1):011009. PubMed ID: 21186899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of factors influencing finite element vertebral model predictions.
Jones AC; Wilcox RK
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 18067394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Application and progress of the finite element analysis model of cervical vertebrae].
Wei W; Bi DW; Zheng Q; Zu G
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2010 May; 23(5):400-2. PubMed ID: 20575307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the finite element method to study the mechanism of spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in the cervical spine.
Imajo Y; Hiiragi I; Kato Y; Taguchi T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E83-7. PubMed ID: 19139658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Heterogeneous meshing and biomechanical modeling of human spine.
Teo JC; Chui CK; Wang ZL; Ong SH; Yan CH; Wang SC; Wong HK; Teoh SH
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):277-90. PubMed ID: 16679044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanics of the aging spine.
Board D; Stemper BD; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Shender B; Paskoff G
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():1-6. PubMed ID: 16817576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A universal algorithm for an improved finite element mesh generation Mesh quality assessment in comparison to former automated mesh-generators and an analytic model.
Kaminsky J; Rodt T; Gharabaghi A; Forster J; Brand G; Samii M
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jun; 27(5):383-94. PubMed ID: 15863347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of a finite element model of the occipito-atlantoaxial complex under physiologic loads.
Zhang H; Bai J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):968-74. PubMed ID: 17450071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computational biomechanical modelling of the lumbar spine using marching-cubes surface smoothened finite element voxel meshing.
Wang ZL; Teo JC; Chui CK; Ong SH; Yan CH; Wang SC; Wong HK; Teoh SH
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Oct; 80(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 16043256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mesh-morphing algorithms for specimen-specific finite element modeling.
Sigal IA; Hardisty MR; Whyne CM
J Biomech; 2008; 41(7):1381-9. PubMed ID: 18397789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of computed tomography based parametric and patient-specific finite element models of the healthy and metastatic spine using a mesh-morphing algorithm.
O'Reilly MA; Whyne CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(17):1876-81. PubMed ID: 18670341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a finite element model of the human cervical spine.
Zafarparandeh I; Erbulut DU; Lazoglu I; Ozer AF
Turk Neurosurg; 2014; 24(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 24848166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vertebral stress of a cervical spine model under dynamic load.
Sadegh AM; Tchako A
Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 10955767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated hexahedral meshing of anatomic structures using deformable registration.
Grosland NM; Bafna R; Magnotta VA
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Feb; 12(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18688764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. C4-C5 segment finite element model development, validation, and load-sharing investigation.
Panzer MB; Cronin DS
J Biomech; 2009 Mar; 42(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 19200548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional finite element model of the cervical spinal cord: preliminary results of injury mechanism analysis.
Li XF; Dai LY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(11):1140-7. PubMed ID: 19444060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
