These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1939588)

  • 41. Use of the automicrobic and enteric-tek systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Goldstein J; Guarneri JJ; Della-Latta P; Scherer J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 15(4):654-9. PubMed ID: 7040462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Preliminary evaluation of Biolog, a carbon source utilization method for bacterial identification.
    Miller JM; Rhoden DL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Jun; 29(6):1143-7. PubMed ID: 1864931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of the Repliscan II System for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Woolfrey BF; Fox JM; Quall CO
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):408-10. PubMed ID: 7026608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of a semi-automated 24-hour commercial system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative bacteria.
    Monnet D; Lafay D; Desmonceaux M; Boeufgras JM; Allard F; Freney J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 May; 13(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 8070459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of the Repliscan system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Brown SD; Washington JA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Dec; 8(6):695-9. PubMed ID: 370143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Accurate automated identification of selected Enterobacteriaceae at four hours.
    Ferraro MJ; Edelblut MA; Kunz LJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 7007419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Overman TL; Plumley D; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):542-5. PubMed ID: 3886691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the automicrobic system (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical card) for identifying clinical isolates of Gram- negative bacilli.
    Barry AL; Gavan TL; Badal RE; Telenson MJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 15(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 7040457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of modified R-B system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    McIlroy GT; Yu PK; Martin WJ; Washington JA
    Appl Microbiol; 1972 Sep; 24(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 4562474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Differentiation of Klebsiella-Enterobacter-Serratia organisms.
    Finlayson MH; Coates JK; Coldrey NA
    S Afr Med J; 1975 Jan; 49(4):123-4. PubMed ID: 1091989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Use of bile-esculin agar for rapid differentiation of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Lindell SS; Quinn P
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 May; 1(5):440-3. PubMed ID: 1176613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of the Quantum II and Rapid E identification systems.
    Murray PR; Gauthier A; Niles A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 6386866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of the MicroScan rapid neg ID3 panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and some common gram-negative nonfermenters.
    O'Hara CM; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Oct; 38(10):3577-80. PubMed ID: 11015366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of the LOGIC system for the rapid identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Pattyn SR; Sion JP; Verhoeven J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jun; 28(6):1449-50. PubMed ID: 2199509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reliability of early identifications obtained with Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards in the automicrobic system.
    Barry AL; Badal RE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 16(2):257-65. PubMed ID: 6749890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of the MS-2 system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    McCracken AW; Martin WJ; McCarthy LR; Schwab DA; Cooper BH; Helgeson NG; Prowant S; Robson J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):684-9. PubMed ID: 7024299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of the autoSCAN-W/A system for rapid (2-hour) identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    O'Hara CM; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jun; 30(6):1541-3. PubMed ID: 1624573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of the repliscan system for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Woolfrey BF; Quall CO; Fox JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 7007430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae by the R-B system.
    Martin WJ; Birk RJ; Yu PK; Washington JA
    Appl Microbiol; 1970 Dec; 20(6):880-3. PubMed ID: 4923807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A diagnostic schema for identifying enterobacteriaceae and miscellaneous gram-negative bacilli.
    Domingue GJ; Dean F; Miller JR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1969 Jan; 51(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 4885606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.