61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19396708)
1. Factors affecting life-sustaining treatment decisions by health care surrogates and proxies: assessing benefits and barriers.
Buckey JW; Abell N
Soc Work Health Care; 2009; 48(4):386-401. PubMed ID: 19396708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Life-sustaining treatment decisions: a social work response to meet needs of health care surrogates.
Buckey JW; Abell N
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care; 2010; 6(1-2):27-50. PubMed ID: 20544476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surrogates' perceptions about feeding tube placement decisions.
Lewis CL; Hanson LC; Golin C; Garrett JM; Cox CE; Jackman A; Phifer N; Carey TS
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 May; 61(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 16503108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments.
Fagerlin A; Ditto PH; Danks JH; Houts RM; Smucker WD
Health Psychol; 2001 May; 20(3):166-75. PubMed ID: 11403214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surrogate decision making for patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
Long B; Clark L; Cook P
J Trauma Nurs; 2011; 18(4):204-12. PubMed ID: 22157528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers.
White DB; Curtis JR; Lo B; Luce JM
Crit Care Med; 2006 Aug; 34(8):2053-9. PubMed ID: 16763515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Actual and perceived gender differences in the accuracy of surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatment among older spouses.
Zettel-Watson L; Ditto PH; Danks JH; Smucker WD
Death Stud; 2008; 32(3):273-90. PubMed ID: 18705171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The process used by surrogate decision makers to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining measures in an intensive care environment.
Limerick MH
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2007 Mar; 34(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 17573297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrepancies among patients, family members, and physicians in Korea in terms of values regarding the withholding of treatment from patients with terminal malignancies.
Oh DY; Kim JE; Lee CH; Lim JS; Jung KH; Heo DS; Bang YJ; Kim NK
Cancer; 2004 May; 100(9):1961-6. PubMed ID: 15112278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decisions.
Hare J; Pratt C; Nelson C
Arch Intern Med; 1992 May; 152(5):1049-54. PubMed ID: 1580708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making.
Vig EK; Taylor JS; Starks H; Hopley EK; Fryer-Edwards K
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2006 Nov; 54(11):1688-93. PubMed ID: 17087695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preferences in end-of-life care of older persons: after-death interviews with proxy respondents.
Klinkenberg M; Willems DL; Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD; Deeg DJ; van der Wal G
Soc Sci Med; 2004 Dec; 59(12):2467-77. PubMed ID: 15474202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attitudes and behaviors of Japanese physicians concerning withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for end-of-life patients: results from an Internet survey.
Bito S; Asai A
BMC Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 8():7. PubMed ID: 17577420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient and surrogate disagreement in end-of-life decisions: can surrogates accurately predict patients' preferences?
Marks MA; Arkes HR
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(4):524-31. PubMed ID: 18566485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogate decision-maker preferences for medical care of severely demented nursing home patients.
Cogen R; Patterson B; Chavin S; Cogen J; Landsberg L; Posner J
Arch Intern Med; 1992 Sep; 152(9):1885-8. PubMed ID: 1520056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Epidemiology of decision on life-sustaining treatment in the general internal medicine division].
Sonnenblick M; Gratch L; Raveh D; Steinberg A; Yinnon AM
Harefuah; 2003 Oct; 142(10):650-3, 720. PubMed ID: 14565058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of surrogate decision making in elective surgery.
Mantravadi AV; Sheth BP; Gonnering RS; Covert DJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2091-7. PubMed ID: 18053910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The views of the judiciary regarding life-sustaining medical treatment decisions.
Hafemeister TL; Robinson DM
Law Psychol Rev; 1994; 18():189-246. PubMed ID: 16523577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Culture wars in New York state: ongoing political resistance by religious groups to the Family Health Care Decisions Act.
Freer J; Wear S
Christ Bioeth; 2002 Apr; 8(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 12956144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Physicians' decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment.
Farber NJ; Simpson P; Salam T; Collier VU; Weiner J; Boyer EG
Arch Intern Med; 2006 Mar; 166(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 16534044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
