These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19396733)

  • 1. Attentional capture by object appearance and disappearance.
    Cole GG; Kuhn G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):147-59. PubMed ID: 19396733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-transient luminance changes do not capture attention.
    Cole GG; Kuhn G; Skarratt PA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1407-21. PubMed ID: 21494922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.
    Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Luminosity--a perceptual "feature" of light-emitting objects?
    Correani A; Scott-Samuel NE; Leonards U
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3915-25. PubMed ID: 16765405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual objects capture attention.
    Yeshurun Y; Kimchi R; Sha'shoua G; Carmel T
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1329-35. PubMed ID: 18299141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detectability of onsets versus offsets in the change detection paradigm.
    Cole GG; Kentridge RW; Gellatly AR; Heywood CA
    J Vis; 2003; 3(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 12678622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Luminance processing in object substitution masking.
    Luiga I; Bachmann T
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(7):937-45. PubMed ID: 18295298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture.
    Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking.
    Enns JT
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1321-31. PubMed ID: 15066393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional consequences of object appearance and disappearance.
    Samuel AG; Weiner SK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Dec; 27(6):1433-51. PubMed ID: 11766935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets: no special role for onsets.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jul; 57(5):583-97. PubMed ID: 7644319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Previous attentional set can induce an attentional blink with task-irrelevant initial targets.
    Thompson C; Underwood G; Crundall D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1603-9. PubMed ID: 17853197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New object onsets reduce conscious access to unattended targets.
    Marti S; Paradis V; Thibeault M; Richer F
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1646-54. PubMed ID: 16375945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional guidance relies on a winner-take-all mechanism.
    Zénon A; Ben Hamed S; Duhamel JR; Olivier E
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1522-31. PubMed ID: 19303424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implicitly perceived objects attract gaze during later free viewing.
    Pertzov Y; Zohary E; Avidan G
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):6.1-12. PubMed ID: 19761297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there brief temporal buffering of successive visual inputs?
    Smith WS; Mollon JD; Bhardwaj R; Smithson HE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):767-91. PubMed ID: 21462092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention and the detection of masked radial frequency patterns: Data and model.
    Smith PL; Lee YE; Wolfgang BJ; Ratcliff R
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1363-77. PubMed ID: 18538812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual field asymmetry in attentional capture.
    Du F; Abrams RA
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Mar; 72(2):310-6. PubMed ID: 19913344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relative contributions of luminance contrast and task demands on saccade target selection.
    Ludwig CJ; Gilchrist ID
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2743-8. PubMed ID: 16580042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.