These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
522 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19396741)
1. Virtual screening - what does it give us? Köppen H Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2009 May; 12(3):397-407. PubMed ID: 19396741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery. McInnes C Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2007 Oct; 11(5):494-502. PubMed ID: 17936059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and virtual screening of target libraries. Rognan D J Physiol Paris; 2006; 99(2-3):232-44. PubMed ID: 16459061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From virtuality to reality - Virtual screening in lead discovery and lead optimization: a medicinal chemistry perspective. Rester U Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 Jul; 11(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 18600572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Homology model-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands using docking and target-biased scoring. Radestock S; Weil T; Renner S J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1104-17. PubMed ID: 18442221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of computational methods in the identification of bioactive compounds. Glick M; Jacoby E Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2011 Aug; 15(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 21411361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of QSAR and shape pharmacophore modeling approaches for targeted chemical library design. Ebalunode JO; Zheng W; Tropsha A Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 685():111-33. PubMed ID: 20981521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel technologies for virtual screening. Lengauer T; Lemmen C; Rarey M; Zimmermann M Drug Discov Today; 2004 Jan; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 14761803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A linear discrimination analysis based virtual screening of trichomonacidal lead-like compounds: outcomes of in silico studies supported by experimental results. Meneses-Marcel A; Marrero-Ponce Y; Machado-Tugores Y; Montero-Torres A; Pereira DM; Escario JA; Nogal-Ruiz JJ; Ochoa C; Arán VJ; Martínez-Fernández AR; García Sánchez RN Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2005 Sep; 15(17):3838-43. PubMed ID: 16005626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of virtual screening as a tool for chemical genetic applications. Campagna-Slater V; Schapira M J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2082-91. PubMed ID: 19702241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond the virtual screening paradigm: structure-based searching for new lead compounds. Schlosser J; Rarey M J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):800-9. PubMed ID: 19354328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A discussion of measures of enrichment in virtual screening: comparing the information content of descriptors with increasing levels of sophistication. Bender A; Glen RC J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(5):1369-75. PubMed ID: 16180913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pseudoreceptor models in drug design: bridging ligand- and receptor-based virtual screening. Tanrikulu Y; Schneider G Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2008 Aug; 7(8):667-77. PubMed ID: 18636071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection criteria for drug-like compounds. Muegge I Med Res Rev; 2003 May; 23(3):302-21. PubMed ID: 12647312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of G-protein coupled receptor models in lead optimization. Tautermann CS Future Med Chem; 2011 Apr; 3(6):709-21. PubMed ID: 21554077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent advances in computer-aided drug design. Song CM; Lim SJ; Tong JC Brief Bioinform; 2009 Sep; 10(5):579-91. PubMed ID: 19433475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Similarity search profiles as a diagnostic tool for the analysis of virtual screening calculations. Xue L; Godden JW; Stahura FL; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(4):1275-81. PubMed ID: 15272835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]