These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19396786)
1. Evaluating a new disc staging scale for glaucomatous damage: the ability to detect change over time. Henderer J; Wang Y; Bayer A; Altangerel U; Schwartz L; Schmidt C Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(3):404-10. PubMed ID: 19396786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale. Henderer JD; Liu C; Kesen M; Altangerel U; Bayer A; Steinmann WC; Spaeth GL Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 135(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 12504696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale in primary open-angle glaucoma: the Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study. Kitaoka Y; Tanito M; Yokoyama Y; Nitta K; Katai M; Omodaka K; Nakazawa T Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 254(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 26666233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma. Spaeth GL; Henderer J; Liu C; Kesen M; Altangerel U; Bayer A; Katz LJ; Myers J; Rhee D; Steinmann W Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2002; 100():181-5; discussion 185-6. PubMed ID: 12545692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-Term Rate of Optic Disc Rim Loss in Glaucoma Patients Measured From Optic Disc Photographs With a Deep Neural Network. Jin SW; Bouris E; Morales E; Caprioli J Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Sep; 13(9):9. PubMed ID: 39235397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of disc damage likelihood scale, cup to disc ratio, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Danesh-Meyer HV; Gaskin BJ; Jayusundera T; Donaldson M; Gamble GD Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 16547323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Nonmydriatic Hand-held Optic Disc Photography Grading in the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project. Waisbourd M; Bond EA; Sullivan T; Hu WD; Shah SB; Molineaux J; Sembhi H; Spaeth GL; Myers JS; Hark LA; Katz LJ J Glaucoma; 2016 May; 25(5):e520-5. PubMed ID: 26900823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting the sensitivity and specificity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters to glaucomatous progression in disc photographs. Saarela V; Falck A; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 20346079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Knowledge of chronology of optic disc stereophotographs influences the determination of glaucomatous change. Altangerel U; Bayer A; Henderer JD; Katz LJ; Steinmann WC; Spaeth GL Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15629818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical validation of Singh D; Gunasekaran S; Hada M; Gogia V Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 67(7):1089-1094. PubMed ID: 31238418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optic disc imaging in perimetrically normal eyes of glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss. Caprioli J; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Law SK; BadalĂ F Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2006; 104():202-11. PubMed ID: 17471341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS): interobserver agreement of a new grading system to assess glaucomatous optic disc damage. Bochmann F; Howell JP; Meier C; Becht C; Thiel MA Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Apr; 226(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 19384783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement and accuracy of non-expert ophthalmologists in assessing glaucomatous changes in serial stereo optic disc photographs. Breusegem C; Fieuws S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T Ophthalmology; 2011 Apr; 118(4):742-6. PubMed ID: 21055815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of evaluation of optic disc change for glaucoma with stereo optic disc photographs. Zeyen T; Miglior S; Pfeiffer N; Cunha-Vaz J; Adamsons I; Ophthalmology; 2003 Feb; 110(2):340-4. PubMed ID: 12578778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation (GONE) project: the effect of monoscopic versus stereoscopic viewing conditions on optic nerve evaluation. Chan HH; Ong DN; Kong YX; O'Neill EC; Pandav SS; Coote MA; Crowston JG Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 157(5):936-44. PubMed ID: 24508161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compressed 3D and 2D digital images versus standard 3D slide film for the evaluation of glaucomatous optic nerve features. Sandhu S; Rudnisky C; Arora S; Kassam F; Douglas G; Edwards MC; Verstraten K; Wong B; Damji KF Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 102(3):364-368. PubMed ID: 28835424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between disc damage likelihood scale and optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Abdul Majid AS; Kwag JH; Jung SH; Yim HB; Kim YD; Kang KD Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(5):274-82. PubMed ID: 20185941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ranking of optic disc variables for detection of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Jonas JB; Bergua A; Schmitz-Valckenberg P; Papastathopoulos KI; Budde WM Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1764-73. PubMed ID: 10845597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Glaucoma follow-up by the Heidelberg retina tomograph--new graphical analysis of optic disc topography changes. Kalaboukhova L; Fridhammar V; Lindblom B Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 244(6):654-62. PubMed ID: 16220279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]