These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19396788)

  • 1. Linear regression analysis of the cumulative defect curve by sectors and other criteria of glaucomatous visual field progression.
    Gonzalez De La Rosa M; Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Diaz-Aleman T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(3):416-24. PubMed ID: 19396788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Specificity of the program threshold noiseless trend for perimetric progression analysis.
    de la Rosa MG; Diaz-Aleman T; Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Jerez-Fidalgo M
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Apr; 35(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 20373897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of tendency oriented perimetry in glaucoma.
    Gonzalez de la Rosa M; Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Garcia Feijoo J; Morales J; Azuara-Blanco A
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2006; 16(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 16703544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of the Moorfields Regression Analysis using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in glaucoma patients with visual field defects.
    Medved N; Cvenkel B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 17415695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Progression of visual field in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma - ProgF study 1.
    Aptel F; Aryal-Charles N; Giraud JM; El Chehab H; Delbarre M; Chiquet C; Romanet JP; Renard JP
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 93(8):e615-20. PubMed ID: 26095771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual field damage and progression in glaucomatous myopic eyes.
    Perdicchi A; Iester M; Scuderi G; Amodeo S; Medori EM; Recupero SM
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(4):534-7. PubMed ID: 17671927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: correlation with octopus perimeter indices.
    Iester M; Mermoud A; Schnyder C
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Feb; 107(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 10690827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of global indices and test duration between two visual field analyzers: Octopus 300 and Topcon SBP-3000.
    Garcia-Medina JJ; Garcia-Medina M; Zanon-Moreno V; Garcia-Maturana C; Cruz-Espinosa FJ; Pinazo-Duran MD
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 250(9):1347-51. PubMed ID: 22270219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optic disc tomography and perimetry in controls, glaucoma suspects, and early and established glaucomas.
    de la Rosa MG; Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Lozano-Lopez V; Mendez MS; de la Vega RR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 84(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 17220776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation between ocular pulse amplitude measured by dynamic contour tonometer and visual field defects.
    Vulsteke C; Stalmans I; Fieuws S; Zeyen T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Apr; 246(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 18193267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of the G1 and Octosmart programs in detecting temporal changes in the visual field.
    Fankhauser F; Gloor B; Iliev M; Kalman A
    Int Ophthalmol; 1997-1998; 21(6):311-7. PubMed ID: 9869338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effective Dynamic Ranges for Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression With Standard Automated Perimetry and Stimulus Sizes III and V.
    Wall M; Zamba GKD; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Jan; 59(1):439-445. PubMed ID: 29356822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
    Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.
    Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Hyman L; Leske MC;
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2271-6. PubMed ID: 19854514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.
    Wishart PK; Wardrop DR; Kosmin AS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 236(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 9672794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Defining 10-2 visual field progression criteria: exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis using pointwise linear regression.
    de Moraes CG; Song C; Liebmann JM; Simonson JL; Furlanetto RL; Ritch R
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Mar; 121(3):741-9. PubMed ID: 24290806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual field defect and perfusion of the juxtapapillary retina and the neuroretinal rim area in primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Michelson G; Langhans MJ; Harazny J; Dichtl A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Feb; 236(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 9498117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-pass resolution perimetry and light-sense perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.
    Meyer JH; Funk J
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jul; 4(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 7492934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring glaucomatous progression using a novel Heidelberg Retina Tomograph event analysis.
    Fayers T; Strouthidis NG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1973-80. PubMed ID: 17662455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Kumar AU; Babu JG; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Feb; 118(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 20728941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.