BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19397129)

  • 1. Use of wound dressings with soft silicone adhesive technology.
    Morris C; Emsley P; Marland E; Meuleneire F; White R
    Paediatr Nurs; 2009 Apr; 21(3):38-43. PubMed ID: 19397129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multicentre clinical evaluation of Cuticell Contact silicone wound contact layer in daily practice.
    Suess-Burghart A; Zomer K; Schwanke D
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Jun; Suppl Community Wound Care():S35-6, S38-41. PubMed ID: 26052993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mepitel: a non-adherent wound dressing with Safetac technology.
    White R; Morris C
    Br J Nurs; 2009 Jan 8-21; 18(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 19127235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Silver-containing foam dressings with Safetac: a review of the scientific and clinical data.
    Davies P; McCarty S; Hamberg K
    J Wound Care; 2017 Jun; 26(Sup6a):S1-S32. PubMed ID: 28594320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation study of the properties of two adhesive foam dressings.
    Viamontes L; Jones AM
    Br J Nurs; 2003 Jun; 12(11 Suppl):S43-4, S46-9. PubMed ID: 12829978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mepilex Ag: an antimicrobial, absorbent foam dressing with Safetac technology.
    Barrett S
    Br J Nurs; 2009 Nov 12-25; 18(20):S28, S30-6. PubMed ID: 20081669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence review: the clinical benefits of Safetac technology in wound care.
    Davies P; Rippon M
    J Wound Care; 2008 Nov; Suppl():3-31. PubMed ID: 19252457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
    Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives.
    Waring M; Bielfeldt S; Mätzold K; Wilhelm KP; Butcher M
    J Wound Care; 2011 Sep; 20(9):412, 414, 416-22. PubMed ID: 22068140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of a new, flexible lipidocolloid dressing on acute and chronic wounds: results of a clinical study.
    Meaume S; Perez J; Descamps H; Voinchet V; Jault P; Saunier V; Bohbot S
    J Wound Care; 2011 Apr; 20(4):180, 182-5. PubMed ID: 21537306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality improvement evaluation of postoperative wound dressings in orthopaedic patients.
    Pickles S; McAllister E; McCullagh G; Nieroba TJ
    Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs; 2022 May; 45():100922. PubMed ID: 35227950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of atraumatic vs conventional dressings on pain and stress.
    Upton D; Solowiej K
    J Wound Care; 2012 May; 21(5):209-15. PubMed ID: 22584737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A case study to evaluate a new soft silicone dressing, Mepilex Lite, for patients with radiation skin reactions.
    MacBride SK; Wells ME; Hornsby C; Sharp L; Finnila K; Downie L
    Cancer Nurs; 2008; 31(1):E8-14. PubMed ID: 18176123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized controlled trial of three burns dressings for partial thickness burns in children.
    Gee Kee EL; Kimble RM; Cuttle L; Khan A; Stockton KA
    Burns; 2015 Aug; 41(5):946-55. PubMed ID: 25687836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a polyhexanide and propyl betaine-based gel in the treatment of chronic wounds.
    Durante CM; Greco A; Sidoli O; Maino C; Gallarini A; Ciprandi G
    Minerva Chir; 2014 Oct; 69(5):283-92. PubMed ID: 25267019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An observational evaluation of a new foam adhesive dressing.
    Merlin-Manton E; Greenwood M; Linthwaite A
    Br J Nurs; 2015 Aug 13-Sep 19; 24(15):S21-2, S24-7. PubMed ID: 26266560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study to compare a new self-adherent soft silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers.
    Maume S; Van De Looverbosch D; Heyman H; Romanelli M; Ciangherotti A; Charpin S
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Sep; 49(9):44-51. PubMed ID: 14581709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using a new lipidocolloid dressing in paediatric wounds: results of French and German clinical studies.
    Letouze A; Voinchet V; Hoecht B; Muenter KC; Vives R; Bohbot S
    J Wound Care; 2004 Jun; 13(6):221-5. PubMed ID: 15214139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized crossover investigation of pain at dressing change comparing 2 foam dressings.
    Woo KY; Coutts PM; Price P; Harding K; Sibbald RG
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Jul; 22(7):304-10. PubMed ID: 20375967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of difficult wounds].
    Onesti MG; Bitonti A; Fino P; Ciotti M; Scuderi N
    G Chir; 2008 May; 29(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 18507956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.