814 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19397667)
1. Comparative efficacy of nonpurpuragenic pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.
Neuhaus IM; Zane LT; Tope WD
Dermatol Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):920-8. PubMed ID: 19397667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Split-face randomized treatment of facial telangiectasia comparing pulsed dye laser and an intense pulsed light handpiece.
Tanghetti EA
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Feb; 44(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22180317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A newly modified 595-nm pulsed dye laser with compression handpiece for the treatment of photodamaged skin.
Kauvar AN; Rosen N; Khrom T
Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Oct; 38(9):808-13. PubMed ID: 16998912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a randomized split-face trial with blinded response evaluation.
Jørgensen GF; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Jul; 40(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 18563775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison study of intense pulsed light versus a long-pulse pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial skin rejuvenation.
Kono T; Groff WF; Sakurai H; Takeuchi M; Yamaki T; Soejima K; Nozaki M
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Nov; 59(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 17992138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Split-face treatment of facial dyschromia: pulsed dye laser with a compression handpiece versus intense pulsed light.
Galeckas KJ; Collins M; Ross EV; Uebelhoer NS
Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):672-80. PubMed ID: 18318731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of a 595-nm with a 585-nm pulsed dye laser in refractory port wine stains.
Yung A; Sheehan-Dare R
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 153(3):601-6. PubMed ID: 16120150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pulsed dye laser vs. intense pulsed light for port-wine stains: a randomized side-by-side trial with blinded response evaluation.
Faurschou A; Togsverd-Bo K; Zachariae C; Haedersdal M
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Feb; 160(2):359-64. PubMed ID: 19120324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea with the fractionation of high-fluence, long-pulsed 595-nm pulsed dye laser.
Baek JO; Hur H; Ryu HR; Kim JS; Lee KR; Kim YR; Choi KH
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2017 Mar; 16(1):12-14. PubMed ID: 27762482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of facial telangiectasia using a dual-wavelength laser system (595 and 1,064 nm): a randomized controlled trial with blinded response evaluation.
Karsai S; Roos S; Raulin C
Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):702-8. PubMed ID: 18318728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative effectiveness of nonpurpuragenic 595-nm pulsed dye laser and microsecond 1064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for treatment of diffuse facial erythema: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Alam M; Voravutinon N; Warycha M; Whiting D; Nodzenski M; Yoo S; West DP; Veledar E; Poon E
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Sep; 69(3):438-43. PubMed ID: 23688651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neodymium-yttrium aluminum garnet laser versus pulsed dye laser in erythemato-telangiectatic rosacea: comparison of clinical efficacy and effect on cutaneous substance (P) expression.
Salem SA; Abdel Fattah NS; Tantawy SM; El-Badawy NM; Abd El-Aziz YA
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2013 Sep; 12(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 23992160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-pulsed dye laser-mediated photodynamic therapy combined with topical therapy for mild to severe comedonal, inflammatory, or cystic acne.
Alexiades-Armenakas M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2006 Jan; 5(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 16468292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A split-face comparison study of pulsed 532-nm KTP laser and 595-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial telangiectasias and diffuse telangiectatic facial erythema.
Uebelhoer NS; Bogle MA; Stewart B; Arndt KA; Dover JS
Dermatol Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 17430378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of rosacea with intense pulsed light: significant improvement and long-lasting results.
Papageorgiou P; Clayton W; Norwood S; Chopra S; Rustin M
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 159(3):628-32. PubMed ID: 18565174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative effectiveness of purpuragenic 595 nm pulsed dye laser versus sequential emission of 595 nm pulsed dye laser and 1,064 nm Nd:YAG laser: a double-blind randomized controlled study.
Campos MA; Sousa AC; Varela P; Baptista A; Menezes N
Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2019 Mar; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 30901061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rosacea treatment using the new-generation, high-energy, 595 nm, long pulse-duration pulsed-dye laser.
Bernstein EF; Kligman A
Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Apr; 40(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 18412227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intense pulsed light vs. long-pulsed dye laser treatment of telangiectasia after radiotherapy for breast cancer: a randomized split-lesion trial of two different treatments.
Nymann P; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Jun; 160(6):1237-41. PubMed ID: 19309367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative efficacy of short-pulsed intense pulsed light and pulsed dye laser to treat rosacea.
Kim BY; Moon HR; Ryu HJ
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2019 Aug; 21(5):291-296. PubMed ID: 30285506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Intense pulsed light vs. pulsed-dye laser in the treatment of facial acne: a randomized split-face trial.
Choi YS; Suh HS; Yoon MY; Min SU; Lee DH; Suh DH
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Jul; 24(7):773-80. PubMed ID: 20002654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
