251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19397865)
1. Unilateral damage to the right cerebral hemisphere disrupts the apprehension of whole faces and their component parts.
Wilkinson D; Ko P; Wiriadjaja A; Kilduff P; McGlinchey R; Milberg W
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jun; 47(7):1701-11. PubMed ID: 19397865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception.
Kloth N; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR; Zwitserlood P; Bölte J; Junghöfer M
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(11):3317-21. PubMed ID: 17156392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abnormal face identity coding in the middle fusiform gyrus of two brain-damaged prosopagnosic patients.
Steeves J; Dricot L; Goltz HC; Sorger B; Peters J; Milner AD; Goodale MA; Goebel R; Rossion B
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2584-92. PubMed ID: 19450613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Face inversion disrupts the perception of vertical relations between features in the right human occipito-temporal cortex.
Goffaux V; Rossion B; Sorger B; Schiltz C; Goebel R
J Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 3(Pt 1):45-67. PubMed ID: 19338716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual biases in processing facial identity and emotion.
Coolican J; Eskes GA; McMullen PA; Lecky E
Brain Cogn; 2008 Mar; 66(2):176-87. PubMed ID: 17720290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage.
Caldara R; Schyns P; Mayer E; Smith ML; Gosselin F; Rossion B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1652-66. PubMed ID: 16269103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
Keyes H; Brady N
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Processing the socially relevant parts of faces.
Benuzzi F; Pugnaghi M; Meletti S; Lui F; Serafini M; Baraldi P; Nichelli P
Brain Res Bull; 2007 Oct; 74(5):344-56. PubMed ID: 17845909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prosopagnosia associated with a left occipitotemporal lesion.
Barton JJ
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(8):2214-24. PubMed ID: 18374372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impaired holistic processing of unfamiliar individual faces in acquired prosopagnosia.
Ramon M; Busigny T; Rossion B
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):933-44. PubMed ID: 19944710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Face-specific impairment in holistic perception following focal lesion of the right anterior temporal lobe.
Busigny T; Van Belle G; Jemel B; Hosein A; Joubert S; Rossion B
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():312-33. PubMed ID: 24503392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding the functional neuroanatomy of acquired prosopagnosia.
Sorger B; Goebel R; Schiltz C; Rossion B
Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(2):836-52. PubMed ID: 17303440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Holistic perception of the individual face is specific and necessary: evidence from an extensive case study of acquired prosopagnosia.
Busigny T; Joubert S; Felician O; Ceccaldi M; Rossion B
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Dec; 48(14):4057-92. PubMed ID: 20875437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early adaptation to repeated unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes in the right hemisphere: evidence from the N170 ERP component.
Caharel S; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Jacques C; Rossion B
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):639-43. PubMed ID: 19084547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How do infants perceive scrambled face?: A near-infrared spectroscopic study.
Honda Y; Nakato E; Otsuka Y; Kanazawa S; Kojima S; Yamaguchi MK; Kakigi R
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1308():137-46. PubMed ID: 19874803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of face spatial frequencies on cortical processing revealed by magnetoencephalography.
Hsiao FJ; Hsieh JC; Lin YY; Chang Y
Neurosci Lett; 2005 May 20-27; 380(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 15854750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative case study of face recognition: the contribution of configural and part-based recognition systems, and their interaction.
Rivest J; Moscovitch M; Black S
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2798-811. PubMed ID: 19524599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces.
Yovel G; Tambini A; Brandman T
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Nov; 46(13):3061-8. PubMed ID: 18639566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using spatial frequency scales for processing face features and face configuration: an ERP analysis.
Flevaris AV; Robertson LC; Bentin S
Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1194():100-9. PubMed ID: 18190897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
McKone E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
