275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19398295)
1. The Bayesian interpretation of a P-value depends only weakly on statistical power in realistic situations.
Hooper R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1242-7. PubMed ID: 19398295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prior convictions: Bayesian approaches to the analysis and interpretation of clinical megatrials.
Diamond GA; Kaul S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 43(11):1929-39. PubMed ID: 15172393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian statistical inference enhances the interpretation of contemporary randomized controlled trials.
Wijeysundera DN; Austin PC; Hux JE; Beattie WS; Laupacis A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):13-21.e5. PubMed ID: 18947971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical trials and haemophilia: does the Bayesian approach make the ideal and desirable good friends?
Iorio A; Marcucci M
Haemophilia; 2009 Jul; 15(4):900-3. PubMed ID: 19473413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research: I. Foundations and basic methods.
Greenland S
Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 35(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 16446352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: a tutorial on the Savage-Dickey method.
Wagenmakers EJ; Lodewyckx T; Kuriyal H; Grasman R
Cogn Psychol; 2010 May; 60(3):158-89. PubMed ID: 20064637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.
Masson ME
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):679-90. PubMed ID: 21302025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the value of a p value?
Grunkemeier GL; Wu Y; Furnary AP
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 87(5):1337-43. PubMed ID: 19379861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing methods for calculating confidence intervals for vaccine efficacy.
Ewell M
Stat Med; 1996 Nov 15-30; 15(21-22):2379-92. PubMed ID: 8931208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnosis using predictive probabilities without cut-offs.
Choi YK; Johnson WO; Thurmond MC
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(4):699-717. PubMed ID: 16220514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seven ways to increase power without increasing N.
Hansen WB; Collins LM
NIDA Res Monogr; 1994; 142():184-95. PubMed ID: 9243537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian hypothesis testing-use in interpretation of measurements.
Miller G; Martz H; Little T; Bertelli L
Health Phys; 2008 Mar; 94(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 18301098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fall-prevention programs for the elderly: a Bayesian secondary meta-analysis.
Lucke JE
Can J Nurs Res; 2004 Sep; 36(3):48-64. PubMed ID: 15551662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.
Bianchi MT; Alexander BM; Cash SS
Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 18812583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic test evaluation: a Bayesian approach.
Buzoianu M; Kadane JB
Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2453-73. PubMed ID: 17979150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
