136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19398297)
1. Associating explanatory variables with summary receiver operating characteristic curves in diagnostic meta-analysis.
Hamza TH; van Houwelingen HC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Stijnen T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1284-91. PubMed ID: 19398297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mixture models in diagnostic meta-analyses--clustering summary receiver operating characteristic curves accounted for heterogeneity and correlation.
Schlattmann P; Verba M; Dewey M; Walther M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 25441701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
Macaskill P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
Nikoloulopoulos AK
Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves with flexible parametric distributions of diagnostic test values.
Hoyer A; Kuss O
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):301-313. PubMed ID: 31953903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.
Pepe MS
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9544511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A mixed model approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies with binary test outcome.
Doebler P; Holling H; Böhning D
Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):418-36. PubMed ID: 22582866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.
Harbord RM; Whiting P; Sterne JA; Egger M; Deeks JJ; Shang A; Bachmann LM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19208372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds.
Hamza TH; Arends LR; van Houwelingen HC; Stijnen T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Nov; 9():73. PubMed ID: 19903336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nonparametric meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies.
Zapf A; Hoyer A; Kramer K; Kuss O
Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3831-41. PubMed ID: 26174020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fully non-parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation for random-effects meta-analysis.
Martínez-Camblor P
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 24872352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
Rücker G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3069-78. PubMed ID: 21170902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) analysis to diagnostic clinical testing.
Rosman AS; Korsten MA
Adv Med Sci; 2007; 52():76-82. PubMed ID: 18217394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
Hattori S; Zhou XH
Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX.
Menke J
Methods Inf Med; 2010; 49(1):54-62, 62-4. PubMed ID: 19936437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An interpretation for the ROC curve and inference using GLM procedures.
Pepe MS
Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):352-9. PubMed ID: 10877289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
