493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19398363)
1. [Robotic assistance in gynaecological surgery: State-of-the-art].
Monsarrat N; Collinet P; Narducci F; Leblanc E; Vinatier D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 May; 37(5):415-24. PubMed ID: 19398363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
Ross JW; Preston MR
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology.
Advincula AP; Song A
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 17625414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Paediatric robotic surgery in clinical practice: a cost analysis.
Anderberg M; Kockum CC; Arnbjornsson E
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 19(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 19830631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic surgery.
Schreuder HW; Verheijen RH
BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):198-213. PubMed ID: 19076952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.
Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP
Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotics in gynecologic surgery.
Frick AC; Falcone T
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 19415063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic assistance in gynecological oncology.
Mettler L; Schollmeyer T; Boggess J; Magrina JF; Oleszczuk A
Curr Opin Oncol; 2008 Sep; 20(5):581-9. PubMed ID: 19106665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future.
Chen CC; Falcone T
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 52(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 19661749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic technology in surgery: current status in 2008.
Murphy DG; Hall R; Tong R; Goel R; Costello AJ
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Dec; 78(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 19087046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.
Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic foregut surgery.
Ito F; Gould JC
Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 17520645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques.
Morgan JA; Thornton BA; Peacock JC; Hollingsworth KW; Smith CR; Oz MC; Argenziano M
J Card Surg; 2005; 20(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 15854086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
