These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19398363)

  • 1. [Robotic assistance in gynaecological surgery: State-of-the-art].
    Monsarrat N; Collinet P; Narducci F; Leblanc E; Vinatier D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 May; 37(5):415-24. PubMed ID: 19398363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
    Ross JW; Preston MR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology.
    Advincula AP; Song A
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 17625414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Paediatric robotic surgery in clinical practice: a cost analysis.
    Anderberg M; Kockum CC; Arnbjornsson E
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 19(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 19830631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
    Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic surgery.
    Schreuder HW; Verheijen RH
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):198-213. PubMed ID: 19076952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
    Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.
    Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP
    Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotics in gynecologic surgery.
    Frick AC; Falcone T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 19415063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic assistance in gynecological oncology.
    Mettler L; Schollmeyer T; Boggess J; Magrina JF; Oleszczuk A
    Curr Opin Oncol; 2008 Sep; 20(5):581-9. PubMed ID: 19106665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future.
    Chen CC; Falcone T
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 52(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 19661749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic technology in surgery: current status in 2008.
    Murphy DG; Hall R; Tong R; Goel R; Costello AJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Dec; 78(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 19087046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.
    Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic foregut surgery.
    Ito F; Gould JC
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 17520645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques.
    Morgan JA; Thornton BA; Peacock JC; Hollingsworth KW; Smith CR; Oz MC; Argenziano M
    J Card Surg; 2005; 20(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 15854086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.