493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19398363)
21. Gastrointestinal robot-assisted surgery. A current perspective.
Lunca S; Bouras G; Stanescu AC
Rom J Gastroenterol; 2005 Dec; 14(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 16400356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results.
Tomulescu V; Stănciulea O; Bălescu I; Vasile S; Tudor S; Gheorghe C; Vasilescu C; Popescu I
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19499656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic abdominal surgery.
Hanly EJ; Talamini MA
Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4A Suppl):19S-26S. PubMed ID: 15476648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robotic applications in abdominal surgery: their limitations and future developments.
Taylor GW; Jayne DG
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():3-9. PubMed ID: 17441019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotics and telesurgery--an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Rassweiler J; Safi KC; Subotic S; Teber D; Frede T
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2005; 14(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 16754625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system.
Advincula AP
Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 17520648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Study of surplus cost of robotic assistance for radical hysterectomy, versus laparotomy and standard laparoscopy].
Dennis T; de Mendonça C; Phalippou J; Collinet P; Boulanger L; Weingertner F; Leblanc E; Narducci F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Feb; 40(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 22252053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy.
Rodgers AK; Goldberg JM; Hammel JP; Falcone T
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1375-80. PubMed ID: 17540810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Robotic surgery and NOTES--Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery in treatment of cholelithiasis--revolution or failed conception].
Ciesielczyk B; Cwaliński J; Janusz P
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Oct; 25(148):380-5. PubMed ID: 19145941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics.
Nezhat F
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2 Suppl):S29-32. PubMed ID: 18762326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
Advincula AP; Wang K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 19423061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.
Amodeo A; Linares Quevedo A; Joseph JV; Belgrano E; Patel HR
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2009 Jun; 61(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 19451894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Innovations in minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Ridgeway B; Falcone T
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 57(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 24145361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Current status of robotic assisted pelvic surgery and future developments.
Ahmed K; Khan MS; Vats A; Nagpal K; Priest O; Patel V; Vecht JA; Ashrafian H; Yang GZ; Athanasiou T; Darzi A
Int J Surg; 2009 Oct; 7(5):431-40. PubMed ID: 19735746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance.
Holloway RW; Ahmad S; DeNardis SA; Peterson LB; Sultana N; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Dec; 115(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 19765807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Holloway RW; Ahmad S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jan; 38(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22136216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotic retroperitoneal lower para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: first report on the technique used in 5 patients.
Vergote I; Pouseele B; Van Gorp T; Vanacker B; Leunen K; Cadron I; Neven P; Amant F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(7):783-7. PubMed ID: 18696278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mechanical failure rate of da Vinci robotic system.
Borden LS; Kozlowski PM; Porter CR; Corman JM
Can J Urol; 2007 Apr; 14(2):3499-501. PubMed ID: 17466155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Robotic gynecologic surgery: state of the art. Review of the literature].
Zacharopoulou C; Sananes N; Baulon E; Garbin O; Wattiez A
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2010 Oct; 39(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 20692773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robotic radical hysterectomy in the management of gynecologic malignancies.
Pareja R; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):673-6. PubMed ID: 18774759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
