140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19398793)
1. Effects of positioning and notching of resurfaced femurs on femoral neck strength: a biomechanical test.
Nabavi A; Yeoh KM; Shidiac L; Appleyard R; Gillies RM; Turnbull A
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2009 Apr; 17(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 19398793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component.
Davis ET; Olsen M; Zdero R; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Nov; 90(11):1522-7. PubMed ID: 18978277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Aug; 22(7):780-6. PubMed ID: 17544555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A biomechanical and finite element analysis of femoral neck notching during hip resurfacing.
Davis ET; Olsen M; Zdero R; Papini M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041002. PubMed ID: 19275431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.
Vail TP; Glisson RR; Dominguez DE; Kitaoka K; Ottaviano D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18762656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement.
Anglin C; Masri BA; Tonetti J; Hodgson AJ; Greidanus NV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():71-9. PubMed ID: 17589356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 1: the influence of the prosthesis size and positioning on the remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck.
Dickinson AS; Taylor AC; Browne M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 20408488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Head-Neck Osteoplasty has Minor Effect on the Strength of an Ovine Cam-FAI Model: In Vitro and Finite Element Analyses.
Maquer G; Bürki A; Nuss K; Zysset PK; Tannast M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2633-2640. PubMed ID: 27535284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. A biomechanical and clinical analysis.
Richards CJ; Giannitsios D; Huk OL; Zukor DJ; Steffen T; Antoniou J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():96-101. PubMed ID: 18676943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection.
Mardones RM; Gonzalez C; Chen Q; Zobitz M; Kaufman KR; Trousdale RT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Feb; 87(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 15687147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strain pattern following surface replacement of the hip.
Ganapathi M; Evans S; Roberts P
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Jan; 222(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 18335714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical optimization of subject-specific implant positioning for femoral head resurfacing to reduce fracture risk.
Miles B; Kolos E; Appleyard R; Theodore W; Zheng K; Li Q; Ruys AJ
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jul; 230(7):668-74. PubMed ID: 27098752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical investigation of implant alignment and femoral neck notching with the Birmingham Mid-Head Resection.
Olsen M; Lewis PM; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):112-7. PubMed ID: 20637560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones.
Loh BW; Stokes CM; Miller BG; Page RS
Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1214-9. PubMed ID: 26330587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of proximal femoral morphology on failure strength with a mid-head resection short-stem hip arthroplasty.
Olsen M; Al Saied M; Morison Z; Sellan M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Dec; 228(12):1275-80. PubMed ID: 25515228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental evaluation of new concepts in hip arthroplasty.
Wik TS
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2012 Apr; 83(345):1-26. PubMed ID: 22489909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical Evaluation of the Depth of Resection During Femoral Neck Osteoplasty for Anterior Impingement Following Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.
Dale KM; Burns GT; Li Y
J Pediatr Orthop; 2019 Jul; 39(6):275-281. PubMed ID: 31169746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cam lesion femoral osteoplasty: in vitro biomechanical evaluation of iatrogenic femoral cortical notching and risk of neck fracture.
Wijdicks CA; Balldin BC; Jansson KS; Stull JD; LaPrade RF; Philippon MJ
Arthroscopy; 2013 Oct; 29(10):1608-14. PubMed ID: 23993057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of femoral neck stress in relation to pelvic width.
Schwarzkopf R; Dong NN; Fetto JF
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 22196384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prosthesis design and stress profile after hip resurfacing: a finite element analysis.
Heijink A; Zobitz ME; Nuyts R; Morrey BF; An KN
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2008 Dec; 16(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 19126900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
