These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1939885)

  • 21. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of a single-channel wide dynamic range compression circuit on perception of stop consonant place of articulation.
    Hedrick MS; Rice T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 43(5):1174-84. PubMed ID: 11063239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Duration discrimination of speech and tonal complex stimuli by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bochner JH; Snell KB; MacKenzie DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):493-500. PubMed ID: 3170942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intelligibility of interrupted sentences at subsegmental levels in young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Lee JH; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1153-63. PubMed ID: 19206889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
    Goverts ST; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Zurek PM; Delhorne LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1548-59. PubMed ID: 3693695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities.
    Faulkner A; Ball V; Rosen S; Moore BC; Fourcin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2136-55. PubMed ID: 1597605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acoustic-phonetic context considerations for speech recognition testing of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Revoile S; Kozma-Spytek L; Holden-Pitt L; Pickett J; Droge J
    Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 7672474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Labeling of /s/ and [see text] by listeners with normal and impaired hearing, revisited.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Jun; 46(3):636-48. PubMed ID: 14696991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996. Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and in sentences.
    Olsen WO; Van Tasell DJ; Speaks CE
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):175-88. PubMed ID: 9201453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceptual weighting of relative amplitude and formant transition cues in aided CV syllables.
    Hedrick M; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Oct; 44(5):964-74. PubMed ID: 11708536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring consonant identification in nonsense syllables, words, and sentences.
    Woods DL; Yund EW; Herron TJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010; 47(3):243-60. PubMed ID: 20665350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The time course of acoustic/phonemic cue integration in the sensorineurally hearing-impaired listener.
    Schum DJ; Collins MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jun; 87(6):2716-28. PubMed ID: 2373805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kewley-Port D; Burkle TZ; Lee JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2365-75. PubMed ID: 17902871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Frequency modulation detection by normally hearing and profoundly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Dec; 30(4):558-63. PubMed ID: 3695448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Wang S; Xu L; Mannell R
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Dec; 12(6):783-94. PubMed ID: 21833816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.