These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19399185)

  • 1. Messina: a novel analysis tool to identify biologically relevant molecules in disease.
    Pinese M; Scarlett CJ; Kench JG; Colvin EK; Segara D; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Biankin AV
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(4):e5337. PubMed ID: 19399185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CIT: identification of differentially expressed clusters of genes from microarray data.
    Rhodes DR; Miller JC; Haab BB; Furge KA
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Jan; 18(1):205-6. PubMed ID: 11836234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed gene combinations.
    Ho YY; Cope L; Dettling M; Parmigiani G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 408():171-91. PubMed ID: 18314583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association analysis for large-scale gene set data.
    Kirov SA; Zhang B; Snoddy JR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 408():19-33. PubMed ID: 18314575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the significance of conserved genomic aberrations using high resolution genomic microarrays.
    Guttman M; Mies C; Dudycz-Sulicz K; Diskin SJ; Baldwin DA; Stoeckert CJ; Grant GR
    PLoS Genet; 2007 Aug; 3(8):e143. PubMed ID: 17722985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved gene selection for classification of microarrays.
    Jaeger J; Sengupta R; Ruzzo WL
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2003; ():53-64. PubMed ID: 12603017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurate detection of aneuploidies in array CGH and gene expression microarray data.
    Myers CL; Dunham MJ; Kung SY; Troyanskaya OG
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3533-43. PubMed ID: 15284100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The molecular basis of pancreatic fibrosis: common stromal gene expression in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
    Binkley CE; Zhang L; Greenson JK; Giordano TJ; Kuick R; Misek D; Hanash S; Logsdon CD; Simeone DM
    Pancreas; 2004 Nov; 29(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 15502640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Molecular alterations in pancreatic carcinoma: expression profiling shows that dysregulated expression of S100 genes is highly prevalent.
    Crnogorac-Jurcevic T; Missiaglia E; Blaveri E; Gangeswaran R; Jones M; Terris B; Costello E; Neoptolemos JP; Lemoine NR
    J Pathol; 2003 Sep; 201(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 12950018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential coexpression analysis using microarray data and its application to human cancer.
    Choi JK; Yu U; Yoo OJ; Kim S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(24):4348-55. PubMed ID: 16234317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying Non-Redundant Gene Markers from Microarray Data: A Multiobjective Variable Length PSO-Based Approach.
    Mukhopadhyay A; Mandal M
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2014; 11(6):1170-83. PubMed ID: 26357053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. TuBA: Tunable biclustering algorithm reveals clinically relevant tumor transcriptional profiles in breast cancer.
    Singh A; Bhanot G; Khiabanian H
    Gigascience; 2019 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 31216036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. INCLUSive: integrated clustering, upstream sequence retrieval and motif sampling.
    Thijs G; Moreau Y; De Smet F; Mathys J; Lescot M; Rombauts S; Rouze P; De Moor B; Marchal K
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Feb; 18(2):331-2. PubMed ID: 11847086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel methods to identify biologically relevant genes for leukemia and prostate cancer from gene expression profiles.
    Chen AH; Tsau YW; Lin CH
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Apr; 11():274. PubMed ID: 20433712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiclass classification of microarray data with repeated measurements: application to cancer.
    Yeung KY; Bumgarner RE
    Genome Biol; 2003; 4(12):R83. PubMed ID: 14659020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dramatically reduced precision in microarray analysis retains quantitative properties and provides additional benefits.
    Ray WC
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2011; 696():101-11. PubMed ID: 21431551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying splits with clear separation: a new class discovery method for gene expression data.
    von Heydebreck A; Huber W; Poustka A; Vingron M
    Bioinformatics; 2001; 17 Suppl 1():S107-14. PubMed ID: 11472999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New gene selection method for multiclass tumor classification by class centroid.
    Shen Q; Shi WM; Kong W
    J Biomed Inform; 2009 Feb; 42(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 18835752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classification of genes and putative biomarker identification using distribution metrics on expression profiles.
    Huang HC; Jupiter D; VanBuren V
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9056. PubMed ID: 20140228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing biological relevance of a weighted gene co-expression network for functional module identification.
    Prom-On S; Chanthaphan A; Chan JH; Meechai A
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2011 Feb; 9(1):111-29. PubMed ID: 21328709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.