These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1939961)
1. Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs. Chen PS; Feld GK; Mower MM; Peters BB J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 18(6):1555-63. PubMed ID: 1939961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of lidocaine on relation between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability in open-chest dogs. Topham SL; Cha YM; Peters BB; Chen PS Circulation; 1992 Mar; 85(3):1146-51. PubMed ID: 1537112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relation between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold in humans. Chen PS; Feld GK; Kriett JM; Mower MM; Tarazi RY; Fleck RP; Swerdlow CD; Gang ES; Kass RM Circulation; 1993 Jul; 88(1):186-92. PubMed ID: 8319332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use-dependent effects of lidocaine on the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs. Cha YM; Peters BB; Chen PS J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Jun; 23(7):1688-92. PubMed ID: 8195533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of the pacing site, procainamide, and lead configuration on the relationship between the upper limit of vulnerability and the defibrillation threshold. Fan W; Gotoh M; Chen PS Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jun; 18(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 7659583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability. Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Martin RO; Ideker RE Circulation; 1986 May; 73(5):1022-8. PubMed ID: 3698224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defibrillation and the upper limit of vulnerability to fibrillation in a transthoracic guinea pig model. Li H; Malkin RA J Electrocardiol; 1999 Apr; 32(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 10338034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Swerdlow CD; Ahern T; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Chen PS J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 27(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8609329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold. Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relation of atrial refractoriness to upper and lower limits of vulnerability for atrial fibrillation/flutter following implantable ventricular defibrillator shocks. Katz A; Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR; Prystowsky EN Circulation; 1999 Sep; 100(10):1125-30. PubMed ID: 10477539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves. Malkin RA; Idriss SF; Walker RG; Ideker RE Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 7648678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical mapping of ventricular defibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles: demonstration of a postshock isoelectric window after near-threshold defibrillation shocks. Wang NC; Lee MH; Ohara T; Okuyama Y; Fishbein GA; Lin SF; Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS Circulation; 2001 Jul; 104(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 11447091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanisms of defibrillation. Critical points and the upper limit of vulnerability. Walcott GP; Walcott KT; Ideker RE J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():1-6. PubMed ID: 8656095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Upper limit of vulnerability reliably predicts the defibrillation threshold in humans. Hwang C; Swerdlow CD; Kass RM; Gang ES; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS Circulation; 1994 Nov; 90(5):2308-14. PubMed ID: 7955188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep. Cooper RA; Alferness CA; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1993 May; 87(5):1673-86. PubMed ID: 8491023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemodynamic collapse, geometry, and the rapidly paced upper limit of ventricular vulnerability to fibrillation by T-wave stimulation. Malkin RA; Hoffmeister BK J Electrocardiol; 2000 Jul; 33(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 10954381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recurrent appearance of protective zones after an unsuccessful defibrillation shock. Hwang C; Fan W; Chen PS Am J Physiol; 1996 Oct; 271(4 Pt 2):H1491-7. PubMed ID: 8897944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation. Wharton JM; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Chen PS; Frazier DW; Yabe S; Danieley N; Ideker RE Circulation; 1992 Apr; 85(4):1510-23. PubMed ID: 1555291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms. Dixon EG; Tang AS; Wolf PD; Meador JT; Fine MJ; Calfee RV; Ideker RE Circulation; 1987 Nov; 76(5):1176-84. PubMed ID: 3665001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation probability of success curves using a nonthoracotomy lead system. Souza JJ; Malkin RA; Ideker RE Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1247-52. PubMed ID: 7850965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]