These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19399664)

  • 1. Effect of listener training on perceptual judgement of hypernasality.
    Lee A; Whitehill TL; Ciocca V
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 May; 23(5):319-34. PubMed ID: 19399664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of listeners' linguistic background on perceptual judgements of hypernasality.
    Lee A; Brown S; Gibbon FE
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 22612628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: a comparison with speech and language pathologists' ratings.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):656-74. PubMed ID: 18821109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of immediate feedback on learning auditory perceptual voice quality evaluation.
    Chan KM; Li M; Law TY; Yiu EM
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 Aug; 14(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 22646315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation.
    Chan KM; Yiu EM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 45(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 14748643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of examiner expectancy on speech ratings of individuals with cleft lip and/or palate.
    Ramig LA
    Cleft Palate J; 1982 Oct; 19(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 6959745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech-language therapy students' auditory-perceptual judgements of simulated concurrent hypernasality and articulation disorders.
    Lee A; Potts S; Bressmann T
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2020 May; 34(5):479-492. PubMed ID: 31429313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech segment duration measurements in adult speakers with repaired cleft palate and hypernasality.
    Leder SB; Lerman JW; Alfonso PJ
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Aug; 98(8 Pt 1):884-7. PubMed ID: 3398667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of anchor modality on the reliability of vocal severity ratings.
    Awan SN; Lawson LL
    J Voice; 2009 May; 23(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 18346869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and Reliability of Visual Analog Scaling for Assessment of Hypernasality and Audible Nasal Emission in Children With Repaired Cleft Palate.
    Baylis A; Chapman K; Whitehill TL;
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Nov; 52(6):660-70. PubMed ID: 25322442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of audible nasal emission in speakers with cleft palate: a comparative study of listener judgments.
    Baylis AL; Munson B; Moller KT
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):399-411. PubMed ID: 20572776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of listener training on the perceptual assessment of hypernasality.
    Oliveira AC; Scarmagnani RH; Fukushiro AP; Yamashita RP
    Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 27191877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Apr; 114(4):753-9. PubMed ID: 15064636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 and perceptual judgments of hypernasality.
    Bettens K; De Bodt M; Maryn Y; Luyten A; Wuyts FL; Van Lierde KM
    J Commun Disord; 2016; 62():67-81. PubMed ID: 27310727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of vowel type on reliability of nasality ratings.
    Watterson T; Lewis K; Allord M; Sulprizio S; O'Neill P
    J Commun Disord; 2007; 40(6):503-12. PubMed ID: 17391692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of two acoustic measures of hypernasality.
    Vogel AP; Ibrahim HM; Reilly S; Kilpatrick N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Dec; 52(6):1640-51. PubMed ID: 19951929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality.
    Bele IV
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):555-73. PubMed ID: 16301102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Listener agreement for auditory-perceptual ratings of dysarthria.
    Bunton K; Kent RD; Duffy JR; Rosenbek JC; Kent JF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1481-95. PubMed ID: 18055769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.