213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19400411)
1. Pregnancy outcome after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.
Michelin MA; Merino LM; Franco CA; Murta EF
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2009; 36(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 19400411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Crane JM; Delaney T; Hutchens D
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16394037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pregnancy outcome after the treatment of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold-knife conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Liu Y; Qiu HF; Tang Y; Chen J; Lv J
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2014; 77(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 24752130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes After Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Bjørge T; Skare GB; Bjørge L; Tropé A; Lönnberg S
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1265-1273. PubMed ID: 27824756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
Mathevet P; Chemali E; Roy M; Dargent D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Feb; 106(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 12551795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Santesso N; Mustafa RA; Wiercioch W; Kehar R; Gandhi S; Chen Y; Cheung A; Hopkins J; Khatib R; Ma B; Mustafa AA; Lloyd N; Wu D; Broutet N; Schünemann HJ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 26643302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery.
Sadler L; Saftlas A; Wang W; Exeter M; Whittaker J; McCowan L
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(17):2100-6. PubMed ID: 15126438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
Huang LW; Hwang JL
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10094873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth.
Jakobsson M; Gissler M; Paavonen J; Tapper AM
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):504-510. PubMed ID: 19701027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
El-Nashar SA; Shazly SA; Hopkins MR; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Famuyide AO
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27977541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Obstetric outcomes following LOOP-excision].
Baldauf JJ; Baulon E; Thoma V; Woronoff AS; Akladios CY
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Oct; 42(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 23809573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife conization on pregnancy outcomes.
Guo HJ; Guo RX; Liu YL
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 23590007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of cervical length and optimal timing for pregnancy after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective study.
Zhang X; Tong J; Ma X; Yu H; Guan X; Li J; Yang J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(49):e23411. PubMed ID: 33285731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes after conization in 80 women. Preliminary data.
Patrelli TS; Anfuso S; Vandi F; Valitutto S; Migliore M; Salvati MA; De Ioris A; Condemi V; Fadda GM; Bacchi Modena A; Nardelli GB
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Aug; 60(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 18560344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?
Fanning J; Padratzik J
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 11838307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization?
Eduardo AM; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Schnadig VJ
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8913973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications of laser conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure in pre- and postmenopausal patients.
Kiuchi K; Hasegawa K; Motegi E; Kosaka N; Udagawa Y; Fukasawa I
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2016; 37(6):803-808. PubMed ID: 29943925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interval from loop electrosurgical excision procedure to pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes.
Conner SN; Cahill AG; Tuuli MG; Stamilio DM; Odibo AO; Roehl KA; Macones GA
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 122(6):1154-9. PubMed ID: 24201682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
