These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19400436)

  • 1. Perceived self-tilt in dynamic visual stimuli: evidence for suppression by vestibulo-tactile inputs.
    Higashiyama A; Koga K
    Perception; 2009; 38(2):281-91. PubMed ID: 19400436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual contributions to human self-motion perception during horizontal body rotation.
    Mergner T; Schweigart G; Müller M; Hlavacka F; Becker W
    Arch Ital Biol; 2000 Apr; 138(2):139-66. PubMed ID: 10782255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. IV. Influence of visual rotational cues during roll optokinetic stimuli.
    Zupan LH; Merfeld DM
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jan; 89(1):390-400. PubMed ID: 12522188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integration of visual and vestibulo-tactile inputs affecting apparent self-motion around the line of sight.
    Higashiyama A; Koga K
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Aug; 64(6):981-95. PubMed ID: 12269304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Roll Circular Vection on Roll Tilt Postural Responses and Roll Subjective Postural Horizontal of Healthy Normal Subjects.
    Cleworth TW; Allum JHJ; Nielsen EI; Carpenter MG
    Brain Sci; 2023 Oct; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 38002463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of optokinetic scene effects on the somatogyral illusion.
    Lessard CS; Stevens K; Maidment G; Oakley C
    SAFE J; 2000; 30(1):140-55. PubMed ID: 11758566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Canal and otolith contributions to visual orientation constancy during sinusoidal roll rotation.
    Kaptein RG; Van Gisbergen JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 95(3):1936-48. PubMed ID: 16319209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. II. VOR and perceptual responses during combined Tilt&Translation.
    Merfeld DM; Park S; Gianna-Poulin C; Black FO; Wood S
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 15730979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How do visual and postural cues combine for self-tilt perception during slow pitch rotations?
    Scotto Di Cesare C; Buloup F; Mestre DR; Bringoux L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():51-9. PubMed ID: 25299446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-motion perception during conflicting visual-vestibular acceleration.
    Ishida M; Fushiki H; Nishida H; Watanabe Y
    J Vestib Res; 2008; 18(5-6):267-72. PubMed ID: 19542600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time course and magnitude of illusory translation perception during off-vertical axis rotation.
    Vingerhoets RA; Medendorp WP; Van Gisbergen JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 95(3):1571-87. PubMed ID: 16319215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. Frequency response of VOR and perceptual responses during Translation and Tilt.
    Merfeld DM; Park S; Gianna-Poulin C; Black FO; Wood S
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):186-98. PubMed ID: 15728767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vection in patients with glaucoma.
    Tarita-Nistor L; Hadavi S; Steinbach MJ; Markowitz SN; González EG
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 May; 91(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 24681830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of self-tilt in a true and illusory vertical plane.
    Groen EL; Jenkin HL; Howard IP
    Perception; 2002; 31(12):1477-90. PubMed ID: 12916672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optokinetic drum tilt hastens the onset of vection-induced motion sickness.
    Bubka A; Bonato F
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2003 Apr; 74(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 12688448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceived range, perceived velocity, and perceived duration of the body rotating in the frontal plane.
    Higashiyama A; Koga K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):104-15. PubMed ID: 19304601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic effects on the subjective visual vertical after roll rotation.
    Lorincz EN; Hess BJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Aug; 100(2):657-69. PubMed ID: 18497358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual perception of upright: Head tilt, visual errors and viewing eye.
    Kheradmand A; Gonzalez G; Otero-Millan J; Lasker A
    J Vestib Res; 2016; 25(5-6):201-9. PubMed ID: 26890421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of body orientation and rotation axis on pitch visual-vestibular interaction.
    Clément G; Wood SJ; Lathan CE; Peterka RJ; Reschke MF
    J Vestib Res; 1999; 9(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10334011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the latencies of visually induced postural change and self-motion perception.
    Previc FH; Mullen TJ
    J Vestib Res; 1990-1991; 1(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 1670164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.