155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19401015)
1. Open Access Tubal aSsessment for the initial management of infertility in general practice (the OATS trial): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.
Wilkes S; Murdoch A; Steen N; Wilsdon J; Rubin G
Br J Gen Pract; 2009 May; 59(562):329-35. PubMed ID: 19401015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of infertility management in primary care with open access hysterosalpingography (HSG): a pilot study.
Wilkes S; Murdoch A; Rubin G; Chinn D; Wilsdon J
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2006 Mar; 9(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16581721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient and professional views of open access hysterosalpingography for the initial management of infertility in primary care.
Wilkes S; Rubin G; Crosland A; Hall N; Murdoch A
Br J Gen Pract; 2009 May; 59(562):336-42. PubMed ID: 19401016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
van Rijswijk J; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; Kleiman-Broeze KA; Traas MAF; Muijsers GJJM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; van Oostwaard MF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Peters HE; Lier MCI; Lambalk CB; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Stoker J; van der Veen F; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oil-based or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
van Rijswijk J; Pham CT; Dreyer K; Verhoeve HR; Hoek A; de Bruin JP; Nap AW; Wang R; Lambalk CB; Hompes PGA; Mijatovic V; Karnon JD; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2018 Sep; 110(4):754-760. PubMed ID: 30196973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can hysterolaparoscopic mediated chromopertubation obviate the need for hysterosalpingography for proximal tubal blockage?: An experience at a single tertiary care center.
Agrawal N; Fayyaz S
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 48(4):241-245. PubMed ID: 29689309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tubal flushing with oil-based or water-based contrast at hysterosalpingography for infertility: long-term reproductive outcomes of a randomized trial.
van Rijswijk J; van Welie N; Dreyer K; Pham CT; Verhoeve HR; Hoek A; de Bruin JP; Nap AW; van Hooff MHA; Goddijn M; Hooker AB; Bourdrez P; van Dongen AJCM; van Rooij IAJ; van Rijnsaardt-Lukassen HGM; van Golde RJT; van Heteren CF; Pelinck MJ; Duijn AEJ; Kaplan M; Lambalk CB; Mijatovic V; Mol BWJ
Fertil Steril; 2020 Jul; 114(1):155-162. PubMed ID: 32553471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The significance of laparoscopy in determining the optimal management plan for infertile patients with suspected tubal pathology revealed by hysterosalpingography.
Tsuji I; Ami K; Fujinami N; Hoshiai H
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2012 Jun; 227(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 22687706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oil-based versus water-based contrast media for hysterosalpingography in infertile women of advanced age, with ovulation disorders or a high risk for tubal pathology: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (H2Oil2 study).
Rosielle K; Kamphuis D; van Welie N; Roest I; Mozes A; van Santbrink EJP; van de Laar T; Hooker AB; Huppelschoten AG; Li W; Bongers MY; Stoker J; van Wely M; Koks C; Lambalk CB; Hemingway A; Mol BWJ; Dreyer K; Mijatovic V
BMC Womens Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):123. PubMed ID: 35436944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Infertility work-up: To what degree does laparoscopy change the management strategy based on hysterosalpingography findings?
Berker B; Şükür YE; Aytaç R; Atabekoğlu CS; Sönmezer M; Özmen B
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1785-90. PubMed ID: 26399775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Infertility management in women and men attending primary care-patient characteristics, management actions and referrals.
Chambers GM; Harrison C; Raymer J; Petersen Raymer AK; Britt H; Chapman M; Ledger W; Norman RJ
Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2173-2183. PubMed ID: 31725877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in examination of fallopian tubes in infertile women].
Bacevac J; Ganović R
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001; 129(9-10):243-6. PubMed ID: 11928602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Infertile couples with a normal hysterosalpingogram. Reproductive outcome and its relationship to clinical and laparoscopic findings.
Cundiff G; Carr BR; Marshburn PB
J Reprod Med; 1995 Jan; 40(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7722970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate guidelines for the management of infertility across the primary care-secondary care interface.
Morrison J; Carroll L; Twaddle S; Cameron I; Grimshaw J; Leyland A; Baillie H; Watt G
BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7297):1282-4. PubMed ID: 11375232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should laparoscopy be a mandatory component of the infertility evaluation in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingogram or suspected unilateral distal tubal pathology?
Lavy Y; Lev-Sagie A; Holtzer H; Revel A; Hurwitz A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 May; 114(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15099873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Premedication Hyoscine-N-Butylbromide before Hysterosalpingography for Diagnosis of Proximal Tubal Obstruction in Infertile Women: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.
Jitchanwichai A; Soonthornpun K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 26(1):110-116. PubMed ID: 29702271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are patient characteristics associated with the accuracy of hysterosalpingography in diagnosing tubal pathology? An individual patient data meta-analysis.
Broeze KA; Opmeer BC; Van Geloven N; Coppus SF; Collins JA; Den Hartog JE; Van der Linden PJ; Marianowski P; Ng EH; Van der Steeg JW; Steures P; Strandell A; Van der Veen F; Mol BW
Hum Reprod Update; 2011; 17(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 21147835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The limited value of hysterosalpingography in assessing tubal status and fertility potential.
Karande VC; Pratt DE; Rabin DS; Gleicher N
Fertil Steril; 1995 Jun; 63(6):1167-71. PubMed ID: 7750583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.
Dreyer K; Out R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):821-5. PubMed ID: 24996498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in examination of Fallopian tubes in infertile women].
Bacevac J; Ganović R
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001; 129(1-2):18-21. PubMed ID: 11534279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
