210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19401825)
1. A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures.
Liu M; Yang Z; Pei F; Huang F; Chen S; Xiang Z
Int Orthop; 2010 Mar; 34(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 19401825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No advantages of Gamma nail over sliding hip screw in the management of peritrochanteric hip fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Jiang SD; Jiang LS; Zhao CQ; Dai LY
Disabil Rehabil; 2008; 30(7):493-7. PubMed ID: 17852303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proximal femoral nails antirotation, Gamma nails, and dynamic hip screws for fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of femur: A meta-analysis.
Ma KL; Wang X; Luan FJ; Xu HT; Fang Y; Min J; Luan HX; Yang F; Zheng H; He SJ
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Dec; 100(8):859-66. PubMed ID: 25453927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 16235272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antirotation proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Shen L; Zhang Y; Shen Y; Cui Z
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Jun; 99(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 23707739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD000093. PubMed ID: 20824825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw fixation for trochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Huang X; Leung F; Xiang Z; Tan PY; Yang J; Wei DQ; Yu X
ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():805805. PubMed ID: 23533361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of compression hip screw and gamma nail for treatment of peritrochanteric fractures.
Bess RJ; Jolly SA
J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 9322196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Queally JM; Harris E; Handoll HH; Parker MJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; 2014(9):CD004961. PubMed ID: 25212485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw.
Madsen JE; Naess L; Aune AK; Alho A; Ekeland A; Strømsøe K
J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 9619458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. A comparison of the Gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw: short-term outcome in 58 patients.
Saarenpää I; Heikkinen T; Jalovaara P
Int Orthop; 2007 Feb; 31(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 16633810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 14973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures: A meta-analysis.
Zhang C; Chen Z; Wang M; Chen W; Ding Z
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Feb; 102(6):e32920. PubMed ID: 36820533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Postoperative implant-related complications after treatment of intertrochanteric fracture by gamma nail or by sliding hip screw: a meta-analysis].
Ding XF; Pei GX; Lin J; Wu TX
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 88(33):2364-8. PubMed ID: 19087702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 12519535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 11869563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Meta-analysis of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screw in the treatment of trochanteric fractures].
Zeng C; Wang Y; Wei J; Gao S; Yang T; Sun Z; Lei G
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Jun; 37(6):606-15. PubMed ID: 22772421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Internal fixation implants for intracapsular hip fractures in older adults.
Lewis SR; Macey R; Eardley WG; Dixon JR; Cook J; Griffin XL
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 3(3):CD013409. PubMed ID: 33687067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative outcome of PFNA, Gamma nails, PCCP, Medoff plate, LISS and dynamic hip screws for fixation in elderly trochanteric fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Arirachakaran A; Amphansap T; Thanindratarn P; Piyapittayanun P; Srisawat P; Kongtharvonskul J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Oct; 27(7):937-952. PubMed ID: 28434124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
