These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19402146)

  • 1. Wear and hardness of different core build-up materials.
    Schmage P; Nergiz I; Sito F; Platzer U; Rosentritt M
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Oct; 91(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19402146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of dental restoratives and their comparative flowable materials.
    Schultz S; Rosentritt M; Behr M; Handel G
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jan; 41(1):e1-10. PubMed ID: 19907723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
    Shabanian M; Richards LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of probiotic solutions on surface roughness and microhardness of different restorative materials and enamel.
    Karatas O; Delikan E; Erturk Avunduk AT
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 May; 48(3):107-119. PubMed ID: 38755989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials and on enamel restored with these materials.
    Francisconi LF; Honório HM; Rios D; Magalhães AC; Machado MA; Buzalaf MA
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18435196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness.
    Mörmann WH; Stawarczyk B; Ender A; Sener B; Attin T; Mehl A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Apr; 20():113-25. PubMed ID: 23455168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of oversized dowel space preparation on the bond strengths of FRC posts.
    Schmage P; Pfeiffer P; Pinto E; Platzer U; Nergiz I
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 19192843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hardness and in vitro wear of a novel ceramic restorative cement.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; Peutzfeldt A; van Dijken JW
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2002 Apr; 110(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 12013563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abrasion resistance of restorative glass-ionomer cements with a light-cured surface coating.
    Hotta M; Hirukawa H
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(2):42-6. PubMed ID: 8008609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements.
    Xie D; Brantley WA; Culbertson BM; Wang G
    Dent Mater; 2000 Mar; 16(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11203534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro wear of flowable resin composite for posterior restorations.
    Shinkai K; Taira Y; Suzuki S; Suzuki M
    Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 26843441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro contact wear of dental composites.
    Nagarajan VS; Jahanmir S; Thompson VP
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jan; 20(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 14698775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative hardness and modulus of tooth-colored restoratives: a depth-sensing microindentation study.
    Yap AU; Wang X; Wu X; Chung SM
    Biomaterials; 2004 May; 25(11):2179-85. PubMed ID: 14741633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the effect of storage media on hardness and shear punch strength of tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Bagheri R; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 17993032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of three kinds of new composite resins].
    Wang LK; Shi LS; Zhu HS
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 26(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 18357875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay.
    Park SH; Kim SS; Cho YS; Lee CK; Noh BD
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations.
    Braga RR; Condon JR; Ferracane JL
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 12542102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.
    Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.