These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19403213)

  • 1. Modeling of the EMRAS urban working group hypothetical scenario using the RESRAD-RDD methodology.
    Kamboj S; Cheng JJ; Yu C; Domotor S; Wallo A
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1012-8. PubMed ID: 19403213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Requirements for estimation of doses from contaminants dispersed by a 'dirty bomb' explosion in an urban area.
    Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1005-11. PubMed ID: 19427717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
    Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
    Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling the long-term consequences of a hypothetical dispersal of radioactivity in an urban area including remediation alternatives.
    Thiessen KM; Andersson KG; Batandjieva B; Cheng JJ; Hwang WT; Kaiser JC; Kamboj S; Steiner M; Tomás J; Trifunovic D; Yu C
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Jun; 100(6):445-55. PubMed ID: 19362757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of fixatives for response to a radiation dispersal devise attack--a review of the current (2009) state-of-the-art.
    Parra RR; Medina VF; Conca JL
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Nov; 100(11):923-34. PubMed ID: 19700226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling of a large-scale urban contamination situation and remediation alternatives.
    Thiessen KM; Arkhipov A; Batandjieva B; Charnock TW; Gaschak S; Golikov V; Hwang WT; Tomás J; Zlobenko B
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 May; 100(5):413-21. PubMed ID: 19324477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External dosimetry in the aftermath of a radiological terrorist event.
    Klemic GA; Bailey PD; Miller KM; Monetti MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16606662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Action levels for automatic gamma-measurements based on probabilistic radionuclide transport calculations.
    Lauritzen B; Hedemann-Jensen P
    J Radiol Prot; 2005 Dec; 25(4):417-34. PubMed ID: 16340070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of health hazards resulting from a radiological terrorist attack in a city.
    Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Schou-Jensen L; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 18550515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvement of modelling capabilities for assessing urban contamination: the EMRAS Urban Remediation Working Group.
    Thiessen KM; Batandjieva B; Andersson KG; Arkhipov A; Charnock TW; Gallay F; Gaschak S; Golikov V; Hwang WT; Kaiser JC; Kamboj S; Steiner M; Tomás J; Trifunovic D; Yu C; Zelmer RL; Zlobenko B
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1741-4. PubMed ID: 18513982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Details in relation to emergency planning in case of undesired dispersion of radioactivity].
    Hardeman F
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):341-51. PubMed ID: 16408830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of realistic RDD scenarios and their radiological consequence analyses.
    Shin H; Kim J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1516-20. PubMed ID: 19318261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of beta particle flux from surface contamination as a relative indicator for radionuclide distribution on external surfaces of a multistory building in Pripyat.
    Farfán EB; Gaschak SP; Maksymenko AM; Jannik GT; Marra JC; Bondarkov MD; Donnelly EH
    Health Phys; 2011 Feb; 100(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 21399438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Worker and environmental protection issues in the remediation of an abandoned source manufacturing facility.
    Hoffman DE
    Health Phys; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Suppl):S30-6. PubMed ID: 12564344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling remediation options for urban contamination situations.
    Thiessen KM; Andersson KG; Charnock TW; Gallay F
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Jul; 100(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19427718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hospital response during the Red Dragon drill.
    Martz MD; Moulder JE; Knight-Wiegert K
    Health Phys; 2011 May; 100 Suppl 2():S56-9. PubMed ID: 21451308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling of the fate of radionuclides in urban sewer systems after contamination due to nuclear or radiological incidents.
    Urso L; Kaiser JC; Andersson KG; Andorfer H; Angermair G; Gusel C; Tandler R
    J Environ Radioact; 2013 Apr; 118():121-7. PubMed ID: 23334288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Key sources of imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments.
    Haywood SM
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 18495989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines for handling radioactively contaminated decedents.
    Wood CM; DePaolo F; Whitaker D
    Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5 Suppl 2):S51-5. PubMed ID: 18403956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.