2160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19403881)
1. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.
Wahl RL; Jacene H; Kasamon Y; Lodge MA
J Nucl Med; 2009 May; 50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):122S-50S. PubMed ID: 19403881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT - RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.
Odawara S; Kitajima K; Katsuura T; Kurahashi Y; Shinohara H; Yamakado K
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():65-71. PubMed ID: 29571803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of RECIST, EORTC criteria and PERCIST for evaluation of early response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Shang J; Ling X; Zhang L; Tang Y; Xiao Z; Cheng Y; Guo B; Gong J; Huang L; Xu H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Oct; 43(11):1945-53. PubMed ID: 27236466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of several SUV-based parameters derived from 18F-FDG PET for prediction of survival after SIRT of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
Fendler WP; Philippe Tiega DB; Ilhan H; Paprottka PM; Heinemann V; Jakobs TF; Bartenstein P; Hacker M; Haug AR
J Nucl Med; 2013 Aug; 54(8):1202-8. PubMed ID: 23729697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PET/CT evaluation of response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST).
Ding Q; Cheng X; Yang L; Zhang Q; Chen J; Li T; Shi H
J Thorac Dis; 2014 Jun; 6(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24976990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of response to stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.
Han J; Song Q; Guo F; Du R; Fang H; Kang J; Lu Z
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Jun; 43(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 35354781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the RECIST and PERCIST criteria in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review.
Min SJ; Jang HJ; Kim JH
Oncotarget; 2016 May; 7(19):27848-54. PubMed ID: 27036043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TLG-S criteria are superior to both EORTC and PERCIST for predicting outcomes in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with erlotinib.
Ho KC; Fang YD; Chung HW; Liu YC; Chang JW; Hou MM; Yang CT; Cheng NM; Su TP; Yen TC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Nov; 43(12):2155-2165. PubMed ID: 27260520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating tumor response with FDG PET: updates on PERCIST, comparison with EORTC criteria and clues to future developments.
Pinker K; Riedl C; Weber WA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Aug; 44(Suppl 1):55-66. PubMed ID: 28361188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures as Function of Uptake Interval and Lesion Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
Kramer GM; Frings V; Hoetjes N; Hoekstra OS; Smit EF; de Langen AJ; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1343-9. PubMed ID: 27103020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.
Yanagawa M; Tatsumi M; Miyata H; Morii E; Tomiyama N; Watabe T; Isohashi K; Kato H; Shimosegawa E; Yamasaki M; Mori M; Doki Y; Hatazawa J
J Nucl Med; 2012 Jun; 53(6):872-80. PubMed ID: 22582049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preclinical PERCIST and 25% of SUV
Savaikar MA; Whitehead T; Roy S; Strong L; Fettig N; Prmeau T; Luo J; Li S; Wahl RL; Shoghi KI
J Nucl Med; 2020 Jun; 61(6):842-849. PubMed ID: 31757841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of PERCIST and RECIST criteria for evaluation of therapy response after yttrium-90 microsphere therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and those with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Sager S; Akgün E; Uslu-Beşli L; Asa S; Akovali B; Sahin O; Yeyin N; Demir M; Abuqbeitah M; Gülsen F; Sayman H; Sönmezoglu K
Nucl Med Commun; 2019 May; 40(5):461-468. PubMed ID: 30896544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: prediction of pathologic response with PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--prospective assessment.
Tateishi U; Miyake M; Nagaoka T; Terauchi T; Kubota K; Kinoshita T; Daisaki H; Macapinlac HA
Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 22438441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung cancer using quantitative dynamic [
Yang DM; Palma DA; Kwan K; Louie AV; Malthaner R; Fortin D; Rodrigues GB; Yaremko BP; Laba J; Gaede S; Warner A; Inculet R; Lee TY
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jan; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 33441162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Quantitative Methods on FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Evaluation of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Bang JI; Lim Y; Paeng JC; Han SW; Park S; Lee JM; Kim HJ; Cheon GJ; Lee DS; Chung JK; Kim TY; Kang KW
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jun; 51(2):147-153. PubMed ID: 28559939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response Monitoring in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study Comparing
Vogsen M; Harbo F; Jakobsen NM; Nissen HJ; Dahlsgaard-Wallenius SE; Gerke O; Jensen JD; Asmussen JT; Jylling AMB; Braad PE; Vach W; Ewertz M; Hildebrandt MG
J Nucl Med; 2023 Mar; 64(3):355-361. PubMed ID: 36207136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Lasnon C; Robin P; Hofman MS; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns DS; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
J Nucl Med; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 27283930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the morphologic criteria (RECIST) and metabolic criteria (EORTC and PERCIST) in tumor response assessments: a pooled analysis.
Kim HD; Kim BJ; Kim HS; Kim JH
Korean J Intern Med; 2019 May; 34(3):608-617. PubMed ID: 29334722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
