2159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19403881)
21. CT evaluation of the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after imatinib mesylate treatment: a quantitative analysis correlated with FDG PET findings.
Choi H; Charnsangavej C; de Castro Faria S; Tamm EP; Benjamin RS; Johnson MM; Macapinlac HA; Podoloff DA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1619-28. PubMed ID: 15547201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.
Skougaard K; Nielsen D; Jensen BV; Hendel HW
J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23572497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical Value of
Hynninen J; Laasik M; Vallius T; Kemppainen J; Grönroos S; Virtanen J; Casado J; Hautaniemi S; Grenman S; Seppänen M; Auranen A
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2018 Aug; 30(8):507-514. PubMed ID: 29753662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) for response evaluation of the neck after chemoradiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Kishikawa T; Suzuki M; Takemoto N; Fukusumi T; Michiba T; Hanamoto A; Tanaka H; Tatsumi M; Isohashi F; Seo Y; Tamari K; Ogawa K; Inohara H
Head Neck; 2021 Apr; 43(4):1184-1193. PubMed ID: 33368784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tumor response evaluation in patients with malignant melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction using
Kitajima K; Watabe T; Nakajo M; Ishibashi M; Daisaki H; Soeda F; Tanemura A; Kanekura T; Yamazaki N; Ito K
Jpn J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 34287739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Usefulness of
Yokose T; Kitago M; Matsusaka Y; Masugi Y; Shinoda M; Yagi H; Abe Y; Oshima G; Hori S; Endo Y; Toyama K; Iwabuchi Y; Takemura R; Ishii R; Nakahara T; Okuda S; Jinzaki M; Kitagawa Y
Cancer Med; 2020 Jun; 9(12):4059-4068. PubMed ID: 32281301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of extremities: PERCIST versus RECIST 1.1 criteria after long-term follow-up.
Xu J; Li Y; Xie L; Sun X; Cai Z; Wang S; Wang Q; Sun K; Guo W
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Jun; 36(6):553-561. PubMed ID: 35380350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantitative studies using positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis and therapy planning of oncological patients.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Strauss L
Hell J Nucl Med; 2006; 9(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 16617388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using positron emission tomography (PET) response criteria in solid tumours (PERCIST) 1.0 for evaluation of 2'-deoxy-2'-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose-PET/CT scans to predict survival early during treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Fledelius J; Khalil AA; Hjorthaug K; Frøkiaer J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 26678718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT for monitoring therapy response in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Riedl CC; Pinker K; Ulaner GA; Ong LT; Baltzer P; Jochelson MS; McArthur HL; Gönen M; Dickler M; Weber WA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Aug; 44(9):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 28462446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography-Based Iodine Quantitation for Response Evaluation of Lung Cancers to Chemoradiotherapy/Radiotherapy: A Comparison With Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Based Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Response Evaluation Criterion in Solid Tumors.
Ren Y; Jiao Y; Ge W; Zhang L; Hua Y; Li C; Zhai W; Tang X; He W; Fang M; Zheng X
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(4):614-622. PubMed ID: 29613988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Are pretreatment 18F-FDG PET tumor textural features in non-small cell lung cancer associated with response and survival after chemoradiotherapy?
Cook GJ; Yip C; Siddique M; Goh V; Chicklore S; Roy A; Marsden P; Ahmad S; Landau D
J Nucl Med; 2013 Jan; 54(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 23204495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prospective Assessment in 2 Multicenter Trials.
Weber WA; Gatsonis CA; Mozley PD; Hanna LG; Shields AF; Aberle DR; Govindan R; Torigian DA; Karp JS; Yu JQ; Subramaniam RM; Halvorsen RA; Siegel BA; ;
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1137-43. PubMed ID: 25908829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Nonsurgical giant cell tumour of the tendon sheath or of the diffuse type: are MRI or 18F-FDG PET/CT able to provide an accurate prediction of long-term outcome?
Dercle L; Chisin R; Ammari S; Gillebert Q; Ouali M; Jaudet C; Delord JP; Dierickx L; Zerdoud S; Schlumberger M; Courbon F
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Mar; 42(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 25367748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative analysis of response to treatment with erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer using 18F-FDG and 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET.
Kahraman D; Scheffler M; Zander T; Nogova L; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R; Neumaier B; Ullrich RT; Holstein A; Dietlein M; Wolf J; Kobe C
J Nucl Med; 2011 Dec; 52(12):1871-7. PubMed ID: 22065872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using MRI and FDG-PET/CT-RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.
Kitajima K; Miyoshi Y; Yamano T; Odawara S; Higuchi T; Yamakado K
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2018 May; 80(2):183-197. PubMed ID: 29915436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison Between
Rossi G; Bauckneht M; Genova C; Rijavec E; Biello F; Mennella S; Dal Bello MG; Cittadini G; Bruzzi P; Piva R; Ceriani V; Sambuceti G; Lopci E; Morbelli S; Grossi F
J Nucl Med; 2020 Jul; 61(7):990-998. PubMed ID: 31806768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of therapy response in lung cancer with ¹⁸F-α-methyl tyrosine PET.
Kaira K; Oriuchi N; Yanagitani N; Sunaga N; Ishizuka T; Mori M; Endo K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1204-11. PubMed ID: 20966329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Soft Tissue Sarcoma Response to Two Cycles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Multireader Analysis of MRI Findings and Agreement with RECIST Criteria and Change in SUVmax.
Favinger JL; Hippe DS; Davidson DJ; Elojeimy S; Roth ES; Lindberg AW; Ha AS
Acad Radiol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):470-475. PubMed ID: 29273189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
