BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19404063)

  • 1. Evidence-based and clinical outcome scores to facilitate audit and feedback for colorectal cancer care.
    Habib MR; Solomon MJ; Young JM; Armstrong BK; O'Connell D; Armstrong K
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Apr; 52(4):616-22; discussion 622-3. PubMed ID: 19404063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
    Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining process indicators to evaluate quality of care for surgical patients with colorectal cancer: are scores consistent with short-term outcome?
    Kolfschoten NE; Gooiker GA; Bastiaannet E; van Leersum NJ; van de Velde CJ; Eddes EH; Marang-van de Mheen PJ; Kievit J; van der Harst E; Wiggers T; Wouters MW; Tollenaar RA;
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Jun; 21(6):481-9. PubMed ID: 22491528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of rectal cancer surgery and its relationship to surgeon and hospital caseload: a population-based study.
    Comber H; Sharp L; Timmons A; Keane FB
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):e692-700. PubMed ID: 22731759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvements in the quality of care and health outcomes with new stroke care units following implementation of a clinician-led, health system redesign programme in New South Wales, Australia.
    Cadilhac DA; Pearce DC; Levi CR; Donnan GA;
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Oct; 17(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 18842970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An easy-to-use solution for clinical audit in colorectal cancer surgery.
    Ugolini G; Rosati G; Montroni I; Zanotti S; Manaresi A; Giampaolo L; Taffurelli M; Pricolo V
    Surgery; 2009 Jan; 145(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 19081479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved guideline compliance after a 3-year audit of multidisciplinary colorectal cancer care in the western part of the Netherlands.
    van der Geest LG; Krijnen P; Wouters MW; Erkelens WG; Marinelli AW; Nortier HJ; Tollenaar RA; Struikmans H;
    J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 106(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22234959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the validity of quality indicators for colorectal cancer care.
    Gooiker GA; Kolfschoten NE; Bastiaannet E; van de Velde CJ; Eddes EH; van der Harst E; Wiggers T; Rosendaal FR; Tollenaar RA; Wouters MW;
    J Surg Oncol; 2013 Dec; 108(7):465-71. PubMed ID: 24115008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data feedback for quality improvement of stroke care: CAPTURE Stroke experience.
    Pandey DK; Cursio JF;
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Dec; 31(6 Suppl 2):S224-9. PubMed ID: 17178307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of quality indicators of care for patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer using a Delphi process.
    Dixon E; Armstrong C; Maddern G; Sutherland F; Hemming A; Wei A; Sherman M; Moore M; McKay A; Urbach D; Labrie M; Gordon L; Barkun J; Lynn Quan M; Dowden S; Bigam D; Gallinger S
    J Surg Res; 2009 Sep; 156(1):32-38.e1. PubMed ID: 19592015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of statistical process control for monitoring institutional performance in trauma care.
    Kirkham JJ; Bouamra O
    J Trauma; 2008 Dec; 65(6):1494-501. PubMed ID: 19077648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discriminating quality of hospital care in the United States.
    Normand SL; Wolf RE; McNeil BJ
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(3):308-22. PubMed ID: 18310529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are pre-hospital time and emergency department disposition time useful process indicators for trauma care in Italy?
    Di Bartolomeo S; Valent F; Rosolen V; Sanson G; Nardi G; Cancellieri F; Barbone F
    Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 17240377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 1: short-term outcome.
    Iversen LH; Harling H; Laurberg S; Wille-Jørgensen P
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jan; 9(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 17181843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of quality indicators for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.
    McGory ML; Shekelle PG; Ko CY
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Nov; 98(22):1623-33. PubMed ID: 17105985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality improvement in New Zealand healthcare. Part 3: achieving effective care through clinical audit.
    Seddon M; Buchanan J;
    N Z Med J; 2006 Aug; 119(1239):U2108. PubMed ID: 16912726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time to CUSUM: simplified reporting of outcomes in colorectal surgery.
    Bowles TA; Watters DA
    ANZ J Surg; 2007 Jul; 77(7):587-91. PubMed ID: 17610699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the CRABEL Score for improving surgical case-note quality.
    Ho MY; Anderson AR; Nijjar A; Thomas C; Goenka A; Hossain J; Curley PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):454-7. PubMed ID: 16263017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring the quality of hospital care: an inventory of indicators.
    Copnell B; Hagger V; Wilson SG; Evans SM; Sprivulis PC; Cameron PA
    Intern Med J; 2009 Jun; 39(6):352-60. PubMed ID: 19323697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving quality of cancer care through surgical audit.
    van Gijn W; van de Velde CJ;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 36 Suppl 1():S23-6. PubMed ID: 20615648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.