171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19404498)
1. Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review.
Golder S; Loke Y
J Med Libr Assoc; 2009 Apr; 97(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 19404498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.
Golder S; McIntosh HM; Loke Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16681854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects.
Golder S; Loke Y; McIntosh HM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):440-8. PubMed ID: 18394536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.
Crumley ET; Wiebe N; Cramer K; Klassen TP; Hartling L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Aug; 5():24. PubMed ID: 16092960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protocol: a systematic review of studies developing and/or evaluating search strategies to identify prognosis studies.
Corp N; Jordan JL; Hayden JA; Irvin E; Parker R; Smith A; van der Windt DA
Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 6(1):88. PubMed ID: 28427475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.
Royle P; Waugh N
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews.
Golder S; Loke YK; Zorzela L
Health Info Libr J; 2014 Jun; 31(2):92-105. PubMed ID: 24754741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall.
Sampson M; Zhang L; Morrison A; Barrowman NJ; Clifford TJ; Platt RW; Klassen TP; Moher D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jul; 6():33. PubMed ID: 16848895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Failure or success of electronic search strategies to identify adverse effects data.
Golder S; Loke YK
J Med Libr Assoc; 2012 Apr; 100(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 22514510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials.
Hopewell S; Clarke M; Lefebvre C; Scherer R
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; 2007(2):MR000001. PubMed ID: 17443625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can electronic search engines optimize screening of search results in systematic reviews: an empirical study.
Sampson M; Barrowman NJ; Moher D; Clifford TJ; Platt RW; Morrison A; Klassen TP; Zhang L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Feb; 6():7. PubMed ID: 16504110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sources of information on adverse effects: a systematic review.
Golder S; Loke YK
Health Info Libr J; 2010 Sep; 27(3):176-90. PubMed ID: 20712712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches.
Bramer WM; de Jonge GB; Rethlefsen ML; Mast F; Kleijnen J
J Med Libr Assoc; 2018 Oct; 106(4):531-541. PubMed ID: 30271302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews.
Yoshii A; Plaut DA; McGraw KA; Anderson MJ; Wellik KE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2009 Jan; 97(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 19158999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The feasibility of a search filter for the adverse effects of nondrug interventions in MEDLINE and Embase.
Golder S; Wright K; Loke YK
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):506-513. PubMed ID: 28960807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches?
Glanville JM; Duffy S; McCool R; Varley D
J Med Libr Assoc; 2014 Jul; 102(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 25031558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electronic search strategies to identify reports of cluster randomized trials in MEDLINE: low precision will improve with adherence to reporting standards.
Taljaard M; McGowan J; Grimshaw JM; Brehaut JC; McRae A; Eccles MP; Donner A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Feb; 10():15. PubMed ID: 20158899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity and precision of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE: a case study of fractures with thiazolidinediones.
Golder S; Loke YK
Health Info Libr J; 2012 Mar; 29(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 22335287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
