These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19404498)
1. Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review. Golder S; Loke Y J Med Libr Assoc; 2009 Apr; 97(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 19404498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions. Golder S; McIntosh HM; Loke Y BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16681854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects. Golder S; Loke Y; McIntosh HM J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):440-8. PubMed ID: 18394536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review. Crumley ET; Wiebe N; Cramer K; Klassen TP; Hartling L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Aug; 5():24. PubMed ID: 16092960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protocol: a systematic review of studies developing and/or evaluating search strategies to identify prognosis studies. Corp N; Jordan JL; Hayden JA; Irvin E; Parker R; Smith A; van der Windt DA Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 6(1):88. PubMed ID: 28427475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies. Royle P; Waugh N BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews. Golder S; Loke YK; Zorzela L Health Info Libr J; 2014 Jun; 31(2):92-105. PubMed ID: 24754741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall. Sampson M; Zhang L; Morrison A; Barrowman NJ; Clifford TJ; Platt RW; Klassen TP; Moher D BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jul; 6():33. PubMed ID: 16848895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Failure or success of electronic search strategies to identify adverse effects data. Golder S; Loke YK J Med Libr Assoc; 2012 Apr; 100(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 22514510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. Hopewell S; Clarke M; Lefebvre C; Scherer R Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; 2007(2):MR000001. PubMed ID: 17443625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can electronic search engines optimize screening of search results in systematic reviews: an empirical study. Sampson M; Barrowman NJ; Moher D; Clifford TJ; Platt RW; Morrison A; Klassen TP; Zhang L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Feb; 6():7. PubMed ID: 16504110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sources of information on adverse effects: a systematic review. Golder S; Loke YK Health Info Libr J; 2010 Sep; 27(3):176-90. PubMed ID: 20712712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Bramer WM; de Jonge GB; Rethlefsen ML; Mast F; Kleijnen J J Med Libr Assoc; 2018 Oct; 106(4):531-541. PubMed ID: 30271302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews. Yoshii A; Plaut DA; McGraw KA; Anderson MJ; Wellik KE J Med Libr Assoc; 2009 Jan; 97(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 19158999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The feasibility of a search filter for the adverse effects of nondrug interventions in MEDLINE and Embase. Golder S; Wright K; Loke YK Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):506-513. PubMed ID: 28960807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches? Glanville JM; Duffy S; McCool R; Varley D J Med Libr Assoc; 2014 Jul; 102(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 25031558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electronic search strategies to identify reports of cluster randomized trials in MEDLINE: low precision will improve with adherence to reporting standards. Taljaard M; McGowan J; Grimshaw JM; Brehaut JC; McRae A; Eccles MP; Donner A BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Feb; 10():15. PubMed ID: 20158899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity and precision of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE: a case study of fractures with thiazolidinediones. Golder S; Loke YK Health Info Libr J; 2012 Mar; 29(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 22335287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]