166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1940537)
1. Longitudinal study of combined orthodontic and surgical treatment of Class II malocclusion with deep overbite.
Jäger A; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Luhr HG
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 1940537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.
de Coul FO; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Pruim GJ; Sandham A
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Vertical and sagittal relapse following surgical-orthodontic correction of distal bite position. Cephalometric longitudinal study].
Richter U; Richter F; Klein J; Michel C
Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1990; 22(4):461-79. PubMed ID: 2101816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Severe Class II malocclusion with facial asymmetry treated with intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy and LeFort I osteotomy.
Kuroda S; Murakami K; Morishige Y; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 19524842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
Ricard D; Ferri J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery.
Eggensperger N; Smolka K; Luder J; Iizuka T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16344217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular advancement with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation.
Thüer U; Ingervall B; Vuillemin T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 7814922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalometric evaluation of surgical-orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Schatz JP; Tsimas P
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9082005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability after surgical-orthodontic corrective of skeletal Class III malocclusion. 3. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
Proffit WR; Phillips C; Turvey TA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(4):211-25. PubMed ID: 1820406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical options in deep-bite mandibular deficiency with prominent chin - aesthetic considerations.
Mommaerts MY; Shteif M; Hendrickx K; Laster Z
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 32(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 14980593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correction of skeletal Class II--anterior deep bite and prominent chin by forced surgical rotation of the mandible.
Mommaerts MY; López-Arcas JM; Schurmans AM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 48(5):349-51. PubMed ID: 20170993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alteration of the mandibular plane during sagittal split advancement: short- and long-term stability.
Frey DR; Hatch JP; Van Sickels JE; Dolce C; Rugh JD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Aug; 104(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 17428696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The stability of bimaxillary osteotomy after correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion.
Ayoub AF; Stirrups DR; Moos KF
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):155-70. PubMed ID: 8301164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of the mandible after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion in 50 patients.
Nakajima T; Kajikawa Y; Tokiwa N; Hanada K
J Oral Surg; 1979 Jan; 37(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 281471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses.
Mobarak KA; Espeland L; Krogstad O; Lyberg T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):368-81. PubMed ID: 11298310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined maxillary and mandibular midline and mandibular ramus distraction osteogenesis for treatment of a Class II patient with implants as orthodontic anchorage.
Takahashi I; Kawamura H; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 20197182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement and its effect on relapse.
Angle AD; Rebellato J; Sheats RD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 17174764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
