986 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19406363)
1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.
Moon M; Cornfeld D; Weinreb J
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 May; 17(2):351-62. PubMed ID: 19406363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Combination of low and high resolution T1-weighted sequences for improved evaluation of morphologic criteria in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast].
Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Schreiber WG; Schmidt M; Thelen M
Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 12424673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fundamentals of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Paldino MJ; Barboriak DP
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 May; 17(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 19406359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
Schnall MD; Blume J; Bluemke DA; DeAngelis GA; DeBruhl N; Harms S; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hylton N; Kuhl CK; Pisano ED; Causer P; Schnitt SJ; Thickman D; Stelling CB; Weatherall PT; Lehman C; Gatsonis CA
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 16373758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimized density-weighted imaging for dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D-MR mammography.
Gutberlet M; Roth A; Hahn D; Köstler H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 33(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 21274974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast agents and temporal resolution in breast MR imaging.
Sardanelli F; Iozzelli A; Fausto A
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):69-75. PubMed ID: 12585658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accelerated bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D spiral breast MRI using TSENSE.
Han M; Daniel BL; Hargreaves BA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1425-34. PubMed ID: 19025951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An adaptive tissue characterization network for model-free visualization of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image data.
Twellmann T; Lichte O; Nattkemper TW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1256-66. PubMed ID: 16229413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The specificity of contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.
Piccoli CW
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):557-71. PubMed ID: 7489308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of breast cancer with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging combined with magnetization transfer contrast using a newly developed breast surface coil for the supine position.
Shimada M; Senoo A; Hayashi S; Moriya H; Nanba T; Kogure T; Nakayama H; Nakagome M; Ito K; Kaneko I; Tsubuku M
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 9192432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the liver: current status and future directions.
Do RK; Rusinek H; Taouli B
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 May; 17(2):339-49. PubMed ID: 19406362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical aspects of breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Hylton NM; Kinkel K
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Feb; 9(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9617899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons.
Fan X; Abe H; Medved M; Foxley S; Arkani S; Zamora MA; Olopade OI; Newstead GM; Karczmar GS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17096393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the selection of optimal flip angles for T1 mapping of breast tumors with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Zhang JL; Koh TS
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jun; 53(6):1209-14. PubMed ID: 16761851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
