These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19406398)

  • 1. A cost-effectiveness comparison of embryo donation with oocyte donation.
    Finger R; Sommerfelt C; Freeman M; Wilson CK; Wade A; Daly D
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):379-81. PubMed ID: 19406398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost of assisted reproductive technologies for a health maintenance organization.
    Hidlebaugh DA; Thompson IE; Berger MJ
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Sep; 42(9):570-4. PubMed ID: 9336753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Frattarelli JL; Miller KA; Miller BT; Elkind-Hirsch K; Scott RT
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17765235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost of transferring one through five embryos per in vitro fertilization cycle from various payor perspectives.
    Little SE; Ratcliffe J; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):593-601. PubMed ID: 16946220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does storage time influence postthaw survival and pregnancy outcome? An analysis of 11,768 cryopreserved human embryos.
    Riggs R; Mayer J; Dowling-Lacey D; Chi TF; Jones E; Oehninger S
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 19027110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
    Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Favorable pregnancy, delivery, and implantation rates experienced in embryo donation programs in the United States.
    Keenan J; Finger R; Check JH; Daly D; Dodds W; Stoddart R
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Oct; 90(4):1077-80. PubMed ID: 18001717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost analysis of shared oocyte in vitro fertilization.
    Peskin BD; Austin C; Lisbona H; Goldfarb JM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 88(3):428-30. PubMed ID: 8752253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A detailed cost analysis of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment.
    Bouwmans CA; Lintsen BM; Eijkemans MJ; Habbema JD; Braat DD; Hakkaart L
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):331-41. PubMed ID: 17662286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopy in women with unexplained infertility: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Moayeri SE; Lee HC; Lathi RB; Westphal LM; Milki AA; Garber AM
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Aug; 92(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 18722609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The singleton, term gestation, and live birth rate per cycle initiated: a 1-year experience in in vitro fertilization cycles with native and donated oocytes.
    Bellver J; Albert C; Soares SR; Alvarez C; Pellicer A
    Fertil Steril; 2005 May; 83(5):1404-9. PubMed ID: 15866576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of retained embryos on the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies.
    Lee HC; Seifer DB; Shelden RM
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Aug; 82(2):334-7. PubMed ID: 15302280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1207-20. PubMed ID: 15136079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in anonymous shared versus exclusive donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles.
    Mullin CM; Fino ME; Talebian S; Keegan D; Grifo JA; Licciardi F
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):574-8. PubMed ID: 19815192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
    Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries.
    Chambers GM; Sullivan EA; Ishihara O; Chapman MG; Adamson GD
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2281-94. PubMed ID: 19481642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Current practices of oocyte donation in France and Europe].
    Letur H
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Dec; 36(8):727-37. PubMed ID: 17850990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.