136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19406523)
1. [Comparison between agar dilution and three other methods for determining the susceptibility of 228 clinical isolates of non-fermenting gram-negative rods].
Gómez-Garcés JL; Aracil B; Gil Y
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2009 Jun; 27(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 19406523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Etest, Vitek and agar dilution for susceptibility testing of colistin.
Tan TY; Ng SY
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2007 May; 13(5):541-4. PubMed ID: 17371537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2, disk diffusion, etest, broth microdilution, and agar dilution susceptibility testing methods for colistin in clinical isolates, including heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii strains.
Lo-Ten-Foe JR; de Smet AM; Diederen BM; Kluytmans JA; van Keulen PH
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Oct; 51(10):3726-30. PubMed ID: 17646414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for the identification and susceptibility testing of three species of nonfermenting gram-negative rods frequently isolated from clinical samples.
Joyanes P; del Carmen Conejo M; Martínez-Martínez L; Perea EJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Sep; 39(9):3247-53. PubMed ID: 11526158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colistin susceptibility testing by Etest and disk diffusion methods.
Galani I; Kontopidou F; Souli M; Rekatsina PD; Koratzanis E; Deliolanis J; Giamarellou H
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2008 May; 31(5):434-9. PubMed ID: 18328674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of E-test and disc diffusion methods for the in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of colistin in multi-drug resistant Gram-negative Bacilli.
Somily AM
Saudi Med J; 2010 May; 31(5):507-11. PubMed ID: 20464039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ['In vitro' activity of different antimicrobial agents on Gram-negative nonfermentative bacilli, excluding Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp].
Vay CA; Almuzara MN; Rodríguez CH; Pugliese ML; Lorenzo Barba F; Mattera JC; Famiglietti AM
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2005; 37(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 15991478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The in-vitro activity of colistin in gram-negative bacteria.
Tan TY; Ng SY
Singapore Med J; 2006 Jul; 47(7):621-4. PubMed ID: 16810437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro susceptibility of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates: comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and agar dilution methods.
Nicodemo AC; Araujo MR; Ruiz AS; Gales AC
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 Apr; 53(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 14973153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing in vitro activity of tigecycline by using the disk diffusion test, the manual microdilution method, and the VITEK 2 automated system.
Leal Castro AL; Buitrago Gutierrez G; Ovalle V; Cortes JA; Alvarez CA;
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2010; 42(3):208-11. PubMed ID: 21180392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pitfalls of polymyxin antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients.
Hogardt M; Schmoldt S; Götzfried M; Adler K; Heesemann J
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 Dec; 54(6):1057-61. PubMed ID: 15509615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro susceptibility of 124 Xanthomonas maltophilia (Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) isolates: comparison of the agar dilution method with the E-test and two agar diffusion methods.
Arpi M; Victor MA; Mortensen I; Gottschau A; Bruun B
APMIS; 1996 Feb; 104(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 8619912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro susceptibility pattern of cephalosporin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.
Punpanich W; Tantichattanon W; Wongwatcharapaiboon S; Treeratweeraphong V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Oct; 91 Suppl 3():S21-7. PubMed ID: 19255989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antimicrobial activity of tigecycline tested against nosocomial bacterial pathogens from patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit.
Sader HS; Jones RN; Dowzicky MJ; Fritsche TR
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2005 Jul; 52(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 16105565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro susceptibility of Achromobacter spp. isolates: comparison of disk diffusion, Etest and agar dilution methods.
Almuzara M; Limansky A; Ballerini V; Galanternik L; Famiglietti A; Vay C
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2010 Jan; 35(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 19889520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Susceptibility testing of unconventional antibiotics against multiresistant Acinetobacter spp. by agar dilution and Vitek 2.
Tan TY; Ng LS; Poh K
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2007 Jul; 58(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 17467946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resistance in nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria: multidrug resistance to the maximum.
McGowan JE
Am J Infect Control; 2006 Jun; 34(5 Suppl 1):S29-37; discussion S64-73. PubMed ID: 16813979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potentially multidrug-resistant non-fermentative Gram-negative pathogens causing nosocomial pneumonia.
Ferrara AM
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2006 Mar; 27(3):183-95. PubMed ID: 16472990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among nosocomial gram-negative pathogens from 15 teaching hospitals in China in 2005].
Yang QW; Xu YC; Chen MJ; Hu YJ; Ni YX; Sun JY; Yu YS; Kong HS; He L; Wu WY; Ye HF; Yang YM; Zhu LN; Guo SH; Ji P; Zhu ZH; Ren JK; Zhang LX; Sun ZY; Zhu XH; Tong MQ; Zhao WS; Mei YN; Liu Y; Zhang ZJ; Duan Q; Li D; Liu PP; Wang J; Han LX; Wang H; Xie XL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 87(39):2753-8. PubMed ID: 18167265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of testing methodology on the tigecycline activity profile against presumably tigecycline-non-susceptible Acinetobacter spp.
Casal M; Rodríguez F; Johnson B; Garduno E; Tubau F; de Lejarazu RO; Tenorio A; Giménez MJ; Bartolomé R; Garcia-Rey C; Aguilar L; García-Escribano N
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Jul; 64(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 19451133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
