226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19406545)
1. Investigating public preferences on 'severity of health' as a relevant condition for setting healthcare priorities.
Green C
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Jun; 68(12):2247-55. PubMed ID: 19406545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
Ryan M; Scott DA; Reeves C; Bate A; van Teijlingen ER; Russell EM; Napper M; Robb CM
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(5):1-186. PubMed ID: 11262422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Equal access for equal need: Eliciting public preferences for access to health treatment by employment status.
Gibbs N; Powell PA; Tsuchiya A
Soc Sci Med; 2019 Feb; 222():246-255. PubMed ID: 30665064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.
Green C; Gerard K
Health Econ; 2009 Aug; 18(8):951-76. PubMed ID: 19034951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does it matter whose opinion we seek regarding the allocation of healthcare resources? - a case study.
Kolasa K; Lewandowski T
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Dec; 15():564. PubMed ID: 26683840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can a moral reasoning exercise improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities?
Johri M; Damschroder LJ; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Kim SY; Ubel PA
J Med Ethics; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 19103946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.
Whitty JA; Lancsar E; Rixon K; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
Patient; 2014; 7(4):365-86. PubMed ID: 24872225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: A systematic review of what counts and to what extent.
Gu Y; Lancsar E; Ghijben P; Butler JR; Donaldson C
Soc Sci Med; 2015 Dec; 146():41-52. PubMed ID: 26498059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How stable are people's preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients?
Ubel PA
Soc Sci Med; 1999 Oct; 49(7):895-903. PubMed ID: 10468394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Societal preferences for distributive justice in the allocation of health care resources: a latent class discrete choice experiment.
Skedgel C; Wailoo A; Akehurst R
Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 25145575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Public preferences for prevention versus cure: what if an ounce of prevention is worth only an ounce of cure?
Ubel PA; Spranca MD; Dekay ML; Hershey JC; Asch DA
Med Decis Making; 1998; 18(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 9566447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Criteria for medical prioritisation: results from a regional survey and methodological reflections].
Stumpf S; Hecker S; Raspe H
Gesundheitswesen; 2014 Apr; 76(4):221-31. PubMed ID: 23913398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value judgment of new medical treatments: Societal and patient perspectives to inform priority setting in The Netherlands.
Nicolet A; van Asselt ADI; Vermeulen KM; Krabbe PFM
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235666. PubMed ID: 32645035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Government and charity funding of cancer research: public preferences and choices.
Shah KK; Sussex J; Hernandez-Villafuerte K
Health Res Policy Syst; 2015 Sep; 13():38. PubMed ID: 26335693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Constant-sum paired comparisons for eliciting stated preferences: a tutorial.
Skedgel C; Regier DA
Patient; 2015 Apr; 8(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 25038741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "I can see where they're coming from, but when you're on the end of it ... you just want to get the money and the drug.": explaining reactions to explicit healthcare rationing.
Owen-Smith A; Coast J; Donovan J
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Jun; 68(11):1935-42. PubMed ID: 19375210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Who should receive treatment? An empirical enquiry into the relationship between societal views and preferences concerning healthcare priority setting.
Reckers-Droog V; van Exel J; Brouwer W
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198761. PubMed ID: 29949648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eliciting public preference for health-care resource allocation in South Korea.
Lim MK; Bae EY; Choi SE; Lee EK; Lee TJ
Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S91-4. PubMed ID: 22265075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Equity Weights for Priority Setting in Healthcare: Severity, Age, or Both?
Reckers-Droog V; van Exel J; Brouwer W
Value Health; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 31806201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
