These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19406583)
41. A within-subjects validation of a group-administered timeline followback for alcohol use. Pedersen ER; LaBrie JW J Stud Alcohol; 2006 Mar; 67(2):332-5. PubMed ID: 16562417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. An experimental study of the agreement of self-administration and telephone administration of the Timeline Followback interview. Maisto SA; Conigliaro JC; Gordon AJ; McGinnis KA; Justice AC J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2008 May; 69(3):468-71. PubMed ID: 18432391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prevalence and characteristics of women at risk for an alcohol-exposed pregnancy (AEP) in the United States: estimates from the National Survey of Family Growth. Cannon MJ; Guo J; Denny CH; Green PP; Miracle H; Sniezek JE; Floyd RL Matern Child Health J; 2015 Apr; 19(4):776-82. PubMed ID: 24996954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Correspondence between Interactive Voice Response (IVR) and Timeline Followback (TLFB) reports of drinking behavior. Toll BA; Cooney NL; McKee SA; O'Malley SS Addict Behav; 2006 Apr; 31(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 15975732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Underreporting of alcohol use in pregnancy: relationship to alcohol problem history. Morrow-Tlucak M; Ernhart CB; Sokol RJ; Martier S; Ager J Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1989 Jun; 13(3):399-401. PubMed ID: 2665555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Assessment of Alcohol Use and Consequences: Comparison of Data Collected Via Timeline Followback Interview and Daily Reports. Merrill JE; Fan P; Wray TB; Miranda R J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2020 Mar; 81(2):212-219. PubMed ID: 32359051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Current screening instruments related to alcohol consumption in pregnancy and a proposed alternative method. Savage C; Wray J; Ritchey PN; Sommers M; Dyehouse J; Fulmer M J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2003; 32(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 12903693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Using interactive voice response technology and timeline follow-back methodology in studying binge eating and drinking behavior: different answers to different forms of the same question? Bardone AM; Krahn DD; Goodman BM; Searles JS Addict Behav; 2000; 25(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10708315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. How good is fine-grained Timeline Follow-back data? Comparing 30-day TLFB and repeated 7-day TLFB alcohol consumption reports on the person and daily level. Hoeppner BB; Stout RL; Jackson KM; Barnett NP Addict Behav; 2010 Dec; 35(12):1138-43. PubMed ID: 20822852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Concurrent validity of an online version of the Timeline Followback assessment. Pedersen ER; Grow J; Duncan S; Neighbors C; Larimer ME Psychol Addict Behav; 2012 Sep; 26(3):672-7. PubMed ID: 22486334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Retrospective self-report of alcohol consumption: test-retest reliability by telephone. Cohen BB; Vinson DC Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1995 Oct; 19(5):1156-61. PubMed ID: 8561285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Help-seeking timeline followback for problem drinkers: preliminary comparison with agency records of treatment contacts. Breslin FC; Borsoi D; Cunningham JA; Koski-Jännes A J Stud Alcohol; 2001 Mar; 62(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 11327193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Concurrent and retrospective reports of alcohol consumption across 30, 90 and 366 days: interactive voice response compared with the timeline follow back. Searles JS; Helzer JE; Rose GL; Badger GJ J Stud Alcohol; 2002 May; 63(3):352-62. PubMed ID: 12086136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Aftercare telephone contacts with problem drinkers can serve a clinical and research function. Breslin C; Sobell LC; Sobell MB; Buchan G; Kwan E Addiction; 1996 Sep; 91(9):1359-64. PubMed ID: 8854371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Cross-cultural evaluation of two drinking assessment instruments: alcohol timeline followback and inventory of drinking situations. Sobell LC; Agrawal S; Annis H; Ayala-Velazquez H; Echeverria L; Leo GI; Rybakowski JK; Sandahl C; Saunders B; Thomas S; Zióikowski M Subst Use Misuse; 2001 Feb; 36(3):313-31. PubMed ID: 11325169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Retest reliability of self-reported daily drinking: form 90. Rice C J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2007 Jul; 68(4):615-8. PubMed ID: 17568968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The reliability of the Alcohol Timeline Followback when administered by telephone and by computer. Sobell LC; Brown J; Leo GI; Sobell MB Drug Alcohol Depend; 1996 Sep; 42(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 8889403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Validation of a multisubstance online Timeline Followback assessment. Martin-Willett R; Helmuth T; Abraha M; Bryan AD; Hitchcock L; Lee K; Bidwell LC Brain Behav; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e01486. PubMed ID: 31793226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Predictors of alcohol abusers' inconsistent self-reports of their drinking and life events. Toneatto T; Sobell LC; Sobell MB Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1992 Jun; 16(3):542-6. PubMed ID: 1626653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]