497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19406618)
1. Early bone response to sandblasted, dual acid-etched and H2O2/HCl treated titanium implants: an experimental study in the rabbit.
He FM; Yang GL; Li YN; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 38(6):677-81. PubMed ID: 19406618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation.
Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model.
Yang GL; He FM; Yang XF; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):516-24. PubMed ID: 18602288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.
Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of a commercial, machined surface titanium implant with H2SO4/H2O2 enhances contact osteogenesis.
Tavares MG; de Oliveira PT; Nanci A; Hawthorne AC; Rosa AL; Xavier SP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 17441982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone response to modified titanium surface implants in nonhuman primates (Papio ursinus) and humans: histological evaluation.
Mangano C; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Scarano A; Mangano F; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 18390239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implant surfaces modified with CO ions: a comparative histomorphometric study in beagle dogs.
De Maeztu MA; Braceras I; Alava JI; Gay-Escoda C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 May; 37(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 18339518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histologic evaluation of human bone integration on machined and sandblasted acid-etched titanium surfaces in type IV bone.
Grassi S; Piattelli A; Ferrari DS; Figueiredo LC; Feres M; Iezzi G; Shibli JA
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 17410906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
Fawzy AS; Amer MA
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: an experimental study in dogs.
Lai HC; Zhuang LF; Zhang ZY; Wieland M; Liu X
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19397636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Piattelli A; Manzon L; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Piattelli M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):805-10. PubMed ID: 9857591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
