These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1940723)

  • 1. The efficacy of step-down procedures during endosonic instrumentation.
    Murgel C; Walmsley AD; Walton RE
    J Endod; 1991 Mar; 17(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 1940723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of precurving endosonic files on the amount of debris and smear layer remaining in curved root canals.
    Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD; Walton RE; Rippin JW
    J Endod; 1992 Dec; 18(12):616-9. PubMed ID: 1298802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
    Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
    J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of balanced forces, endosonic, and step-back filing instrumentation techniques: quantification of extruded apical debris.
    McKendry DJ
    J Endod; 1990 Jan; 16(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2388013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Manual instrumentation of root canals. Review of the last decade].
    Roig Cayón M; Basilio Monne J; Canalda Sahli C
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1991 Jan; 7(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 2018612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of precurving on the performance of endosonic K files.
    Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD
    J Endod; 1992 May; 18(5):232-6. PubMed ID: 1402578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Canal markings produced by endosonic instruments.
    Walmsley AD; Murgel C; Krell KV
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1991 Apr; 7(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 1782900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cleaning of oval canals using ultrasonic or sonic instrumentation.
    Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD; Walton RE; Rippin JW
    J Endod; 1993 Sep; 19(9):453-7. PubMed ID: 8263452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different endodontic procedures on dentin morphology of human teeth.
    Prati C; Selighini M; Ferrieri P; Mongiorgi R
    J Endod; 1994 Apr; 20(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 8035157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Endosonics: a new era of endodontic therapy?].
    Panitvisai P
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1990; 40(3):129-38. PubMed ID: 2074324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 1402562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Step-back method for intracanal preparation with multiple length determination of the tooth root canal].
    Tamarut T; Blasković V; Cindrić N; Maricić B
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1989; 23(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 2641427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Haidet J; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 2607289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current concepts of canal preparation.
    Walton RE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 36(2):309-26. PubMed ID: 1572501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vibration pattern of different endosonic instruments.
    Gomma MM; Samy IS; Farag MM; Elinein NA
    Egypt Dent J; 1992 Jan; 38(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 1343997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of root canal preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation.
    Hülsmann M; Stryga F
    J Endod; 1993 Mar; 19(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of apically extruded debris in conventional and rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Bidar M; Rastegar AF; Ghaziani P; Namazikhah MS
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Sep; 32(9):665-71. PubMed ID: 15553960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical use of the Sonic Air MM 1500 and the Meca Sonic 1400 in canal preparation in endodontics].
    Gaye F; Ba I; Kane AW; Mbaye M; Ndoye Diop A; Agboton-Johnson CA
    Odontostomatol Trop; 1991 Mar; 14(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 1886833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentin removal efficiency of six endodontic systems: a quantitative comparison.
    Hennequin M; Andre JF; Botta G
    J Endod; 1992 Dec; 18(12):601-4. PubMed ID: 1298799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.