These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1940753)

  • 1. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques.
    Myers GL; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):275-9. PubMed ID: 1940753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of balanced forces, endosonic, and step-back filing instrumentation techniques: quantification of extruded apical debris.
    McKendry DJ
    J Endod; 1990 Jan; 16(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 2388013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of debris extruded apically in straight canals: conventional filing versus profile .04 Taper series 29.
    Beeson TJ; Hartwell GR; Thornton JD; Gunsolley JC
    J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 9487860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of apically extruded debris in conventional and rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Bidar M; Rastegar AF; Ghaziani P; Namazikhah MS
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Sep; 32(9):665-71. PubMed ID: 15553960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of guidelines for the apical enlargement of maxillary premolars.
    Kasahara E; Yasuda E; Yamada H; Miyazawa A
    J Endod; 1991 Jan; 17(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1895032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Reddy SA; Hicks ML
    J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Hinrichs RE; Walker WA; Schindler WG
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9641140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Er K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 18230395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
    Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An ex vivo quantification of the apically extruded bacteria following use of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Mohammadi Z
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):120-2. PubMed ID: 18277742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Apical third instrumentation of curved canals with K-type and canal master instruments.
    Shankar P; Parameswaran A; Lakshminarayanan L
    J Endod; 1993 May; 19(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 8360597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of solvents on apically extruded debris and irrigant during root canal retreatment using reciprocating instruments.
    Keskin C; Sariyilmaz E; Sariyilmaz O
    Int Endod J; 2017 Nov; 50(11):1084-1088. PubMed ID: 27917509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Manual instrumentation of root canals. Review of the last decade].
    Roig Cayón M; Basilio Monne J; Canalda Sahli C
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1991 Jan; 7(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 2018612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitch: a pilot study.
    Elmsallati EA; Wadachi R; Suda H
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19703077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel noninstrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system.
    Lussi A; Nussbächer U; Grosrey J
    J Endod; 1993 Nov; 19(11):549-53. PubMed ID: 8151242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The efficacy of step-down procedures during endosonic instrumentation.
    Murgel C; Walmsley AD; Walton RE
    J Endod; 1991 Mar; 17(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 1940723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two ultrasonic units in shaping simulated curved canals.
    Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR
    J Endod; 1989 Oct; 15(10):457-62. PubMed ID: 2639937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria following use of new rotary instrumentation system.
    Mohammadi Z
    N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 19548490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ex vivo microscopic assessment of factors affecting the quality of apical seal created by root-end fillings.
    Tobón-Arroyave SI; Restrepo-Pérez MM; Arismendi-Echavarría JA; Velásquez-Restrepo Z; Marín-Botero ML; García-Dorado EC
    Int Endod J; 2007 Aug; 40(8):590-602. PubMed ID: 17511788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3 different rotary instrumentation systems.
    Tanalp J; Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Bayirl G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 16448929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.