669 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19407635)
1. Integrated plastic surgery residency applicant survey: characteristics of successful applicants and feedback about the interview process.
Rogers CR; Gutowski KA; Rio AM; Larson DL; Edwards M; Hansen JE; Lawrence WT; Stevenson TR; Bentz ML
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 May; 123(5):1607-1617. PubMed ID: 19407635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The "Independent" Plastic Surgery Match: Analysis of Changes in Recent Years and Applicant Preferences.
Hammoudeh ZS; Mostafa G; Saint-Cyr M; Bakri K; Mardini S
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 27886967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome analysis of factors impacting the plastic surgery match.
Wood JS; David LR
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 64(6):770-4. PubMed ID: 20489406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A survey of demographics, motivations, and backgrounds among applicants to the integrated 0 + 5 vascular surgery residency.
Lee JT; Teshome M; de Virgilio C; Ishaque B; Qiu M; Dalman RL
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 51(2):496-502; discussion 502-3. PubMed ID: 20022205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.
Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applying to Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Programs: Trends in the Past 5 Years of the Match.
Tadisina KK; Orra S; Bassiri Gharb B; Kwiecien G; Bernard S; Zins JE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 26761515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of Plastic Surgery Applicant Success: An Analysis of the Texas STAR Database.
Hallman TG; Qureshi U; Soltani H; Gutowski KS; Arcelona C; Donaldson R; Mihalic AP; Gosain AK
J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 35(4):1084-1088. PubMed ID: 38709027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What Makes a Plastic Surgery Residency Program Attractive? An Applicant's Perspective.
Atashroo DA; Luan A; Vyas KS; Zielins ER; Maan Z; Duscher D; Walmsley GG; Lynch MP; Davenport DL; Wan DC; Longaker MT; Vasconez HC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jul; 136(1):189-196. PubMed ID: 26111321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.
Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; Haeberle HS; Taylor SA; Mont MA
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 26(15):537-544. PubMed ID: 29870416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Phantom" publications among plastic surgery residency applicants.
Chung CK; Hernandez-Boussard T; Lee GK
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 68(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 22421486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selection criteria for the integrated model of plastic surgery residency.
LaGrasso JR; Kennedy DA; Hoehn JG; Ashruf S; Przybyla AM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Mar; 121(3):121e-125e. PubMed ID: 18317094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Updated View of the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.
Borsting EA; Chim JH; Thaller SR
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Nov; 75(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 26418789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Away Rotations and Matching in Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: Applicant and Program Director Perspectives.
Drolet BC; Brower JP; Lifchez SD; Janis JE; Liu PY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 27018690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preference Signaling and the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match: A National Survey Study.
Sergesketter AR; Song E; Shammas RL; Tian WM; Eberlin KR; Ko JH; Momoh AO; Snyder-Warwick A; Phillips BT
J Surg Educ; 2024 May; 81(5):662-670. PubMed ID: 38553367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors That Affect Medical Students' Perception and Impression of a Plastic Surgery Program: The Role of Elective Rotations and Interviews.
Zuo KJ; Retrouvey H; Wanzel KR
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Feb; 82(2):224-228. PubMed ID: 29916893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Underrepresented Minorities are Underrepresented Among General Surgery Applicants Selected to Interview.
Jarman BT; Kallies KJ; Joshi ART; Smink DS; Sarosi GA; Chang L; Green JM; Greenberg JA; Melcher ML; Nfonsam V; Ramirez LD; Borgert AJ; Whiting J
J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(6):e15-e23. PubMed ID: 31175064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Perception and Costs of the Interview Process for Plastic Surgery Residency Programs: Can the Process Be Streamlined?
Susarla SM; Swanson EW; Slezak S; Lifchez SD; Redett RJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Jan; 139(1):302e-309e. PubMed ID: 27632394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current Applicant Perceptions of the Ophthalmology Residency Match.
Venincasa MJ; Cai LZ; Gedde SJ; Uhler T; Sridhar J
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 138(5):460-466. PubMed ID: 32163107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent trends in applicants and the matching process for the integrated plastic surgery match.
Super N; Tieman J; Boucher K; Rockwell WB; Agarwal JP
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 23407248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtual Interviews for the Independent Plastic Surgery Match: A Modern Convenience or a Modern Misrepresentation?
Bamba R; Bhagat N; Tran PC; Westrick E; Hassanein AH; Wooden WA
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(2):612-621. PubMed ID: 32958417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
