674 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19407635)
41. Correlation of Behavioral Interviewing Performance With Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applicant Characteristics☆?>.
Breitkopf DM; Vaughan LE; Hopkins MR
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):954-958. PubMed ID: 27321984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The presence of "ghost" citations in an applicant pool of an integrated plastic surgery residency program.
Larson JD; Sisolak BB; King TW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1390-1394. PubMed ID: 20885262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Plastic Surgery Residency Applicants' Perceptions of a Virtual Interview Cycle.
Shen AH; Shiah E; Sarac BA; Maselli AM; Nassar AH; Lee BT; Janis JE; Lin SJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Oct; 150(4):930-939. PubMed ID: 35939639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Linear Modeling to Reduce Bias in Plastic Surgery Residency Selection.
Elmaraghi S; Rao VK; Christie BM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):538-544. PubMed ID: 33587559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Characteristics of highly ranked applicants to general surgery residency programs.
Stain SC; Hiatt JR; Ata A; Ashley SW; Roggin KK; Potts JR; Moore RA; Galante JM; Britt LD; Deveney KE; Ellison EC
JAMA Surg; 2013 May; 148(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 23677403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Integrated Plastic Surgery Match: Trends in Research Productivity of Successful Candidates.
Ngaage LM; Elegbede A; McGlone KL; Knighton BJ; Cooney CM; Cooney DS; Lifchez SD; Slezak S; Rasko YM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jul; 146(1):193-201. PubMed ID: 32590665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Aesthetic Surgery Fellowship Selection Criteria: A National Fellowship Director Survey.
Egro FM; Saliu OT; Nahai F; Nguyen VT
Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Sep; 37(8):961-966. PubMed ID: 28333194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Making a match: trends in the application, interview, and ranking process for the neurological surgery residency programs.
Yaeger KA; Schupper AJ; Gilligan JT; Germano IM
J Neurosurg; 2021 May; 135(6):1882-1888. PubMed ID: 34049279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. How Informative are the Plastic Surgery Residency Websites to Prospective Applicants?
Hashmi A; Policherla R; Campbell H; Khan FA; Schumaier A; Al-Mufarrej F
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(1):74-78. PubMed ID: 27717704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessment of moral reasoning skills in the orthopaedic surgery resident applicant.
Bohm KC; Van Heest T; Gioe TJ; Agel J; Johnson TC; Van Heest A
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Sep; 96(17):e151. PubMed ID: 25187595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Factors and Influences That Determine the Choices of Surgery Residency Applicants.
Jarman BT; Joshi AR; Trickey AW; Dort JM; Kallies KJ; Sidwell RA
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e163-71. PubMed ID: 26143518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Update on the Selection Criteria of Plastic Surgery Residents: A Survey of Program Directors and Associate Program Directors.
Asghari A; Hines E; Mocharnuk J; Leis A; Wang ED
Ann Plast Surg; 2024 May; 92(5S Suppl 3):S327-S330. PubMed ID: 38369381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The plastic surgery match: predicting success and improving the process.
Claiborne JR; Crantford JC; Swett KR; David LR
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jun; 70(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 23673567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Charting the Effect of the Universal Offer Date on Plastic Surgery Residency Matches.
Harris JM; Janhofer DE; Poveromo LP; Otterburn DM
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S229-S234. PubMed ID: 35513325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Insights from San Francisco match rank lists, part II: are programs doing it wrong?
Nagarkar PA; Malafa M; Janis JE
Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Oct; 73(4):422-6. PubMed ID: 25222925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. An analysis of applicant competitiveness to general surgery, surgical subspecialties, and integrated programs.
Vaysburg DM; Cortez AR; Hanseman DJ; Delman AM; Morris C; Kassam AF; Kutz D; Lewis J; Van Haren RM; Quillin RC
Surgery; 2021 Oct; 170(4):1087-1092. PubMed ID: 33879334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Poly-Specialty Application Practices of Medical Students Applying to Integrated Vascular Surgery Residency.
McMackin KK; Trani J; Carpenter JP; Batista PM; Fadoul MA; Hoell NG; Lombardi JV
Ann Vasc Surg; 2020 Nov; 69():125-132. PubMed ID: 32554201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Characteristics of Successful Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicants from US Allopathic Medical Schools without a Home Integrated Program.
Keane CA; Akhter MF; Sarac BA; Janis JE
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(2):551-557. PubMed ID: 34840121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Ophthalmology Residency Match in the Covid-19 Era: Applicant and Program Director Perceptions of the 2020-2021 Application Cycle.
Venincasa MJ; Steren B; Young BK; Parikh A; Ahmed B; Sridhar J; Kombo N
Semin Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 37(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 33825672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Applicant Trends and Comparison With Other Surgical Specialties.
Abraham JT; Nguyen AV; Weber RA
Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Feb; 80(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 28906299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
