281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19408480)
1. A comparative study of two root-coverage techniques with regard to interdental papilla dimension as a prognostic factor.
Haghighati F; Mousavi M; Moslemi N; Kebria MM; Golestan B
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Apr; 29(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 19408480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Rahmani ME; Lades MA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 16685296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in treatment of gingival recessions: a 5-year randomized clinical study.
Moslemi N; Mousavi Jazi M; Haghighati F; Morovati SP; Jamali R
J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Dec; 38(12):1122-9. PubMed ID: 22092784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acellular dermal matrix seeded with autologous gingival fibroblasts for the treatment of gingival recession: a proof-of-concept study.
Jhaveri HM; Chavan MS; Tomar GB; Deshmukh VL; Wani MR; Miller PD
J Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 81(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 20367104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical/statistical comparison between the subpedicle connective tissue graft method and the guided tissue regeneration technique in root coverage.
Ricci G; Silvestri M; Tinti C; Rasperini G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Dec; 16(6):538-45. PubMed ID: 9242092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: a comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts.
Tal H; Moses O; Zohar R; Meir H; Nemcovsky C
J Periodontol; 2002 Dec; 73(12):1405-11. PubMed ID: 12546089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study.
Bittencourt S; Ribeiro Edel P; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2009 Jul; 80(7):1076-82. PubMed ID: 19563287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft: results of 107 recession defects in 50 consecutively treated patients.
Harris RJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Feb; 20(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11203548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and modified tunnel technique. An evaluation of long-term results.
Tözüm TF
N Y State Dent J; 2006; 72(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 16925012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of gingival recession: comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration.
Rosetti EP; Marcantonio RA; Rossa C; Chaves ES; Goissis G; Marcantonio E
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1441-7. PubMed ID: 11022773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predetermination of root coverage.
Zucchelli G; Mele M; Stefanini M; Mazzotti C; Mounssif I; Marzadori M; Montebugnoli L
J Periodontol; 2010 Jul; 81(7):1019-26. PubMed ID: 20192618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coronally advanced flap procedure: is the interdental papilla a prognostic factor for root coverage?
Saletta D; Pini Prato G; Pagliaro U; Baldi C; Mauri M; Nieri M
J Periodontol; 2001 Jun; 72(6):760-6. PubMed ID: 11453238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tunneling procedure for root coverage using acellular dermal matrix: a case series.
Modaressi M; Wang HL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Aug; 29(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 19639060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimizing shrinkage of interdental papilla height when treating multiple Miller Class III gingival recession defects.
Mahn DH
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Apr; 36(4):275-6, 279-81. PubMed ID: 25821939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of periodontal applications of a living tissue-engineered human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute. II. Comparison to the subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled feasibility study.
Wilson TG; McGuire MK; Nunn ME
J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):881-9. PubMed ID: 15948681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The subepithelial connective tissue graft: part II. Histologic healing and clinical root coverage.
Sedon CL; Breault LG; Covington LL; Bishop BG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 May; 6(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 15915213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between two surgical techniques for root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix graft.
Andrade PF; Felipe ME; Novaes AB; Souza SL; Taba M; Palioto DB; Grisi MF
J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Mar; 35(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 18269666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of connective tissue graft orientation on root coverage and gingival augmentation.
Al-Zahrani MS; Bissada NF; Ficara AJ; Cole B
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Feb; 24(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 14984147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
