2939 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19408970)
1. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Gienger A; Cheng YW; McDonald KM; Shaffer BL; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 151(4):252-63, W53-63. PubMed ID: 19687492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.
Middleton P; Shepherd E; Morris J; Crowther CA; Gomersall JC
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD004945. PubMed ID: 32666584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.
Middleton P; Shepherd E; Crowther CA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 May; 5(5):CD004945. PubMed ID: 29741208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.
Bond DM; Middleton P; Levett KM; van der Ham DP; Crowther CA; Buchanan SL; Morris J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 3(3):CD004735. PubMed ID: 28257562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review.
Rydahl E; Eriksen L; Juhl M
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Feb; 17(2):170-208. PubMed ID: 30299344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Grobman WA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Hong J; Atkinson J; Roddy Mitchell A; Tong S; Walker SP; Middleton A; Lindquist A; Hastie R
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 May; 6(5):e2313162. PubMed ID: 37171818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [INDUCTION OF LABOR AT 39 WEEKS OF GESTATION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT].
Sgayer I; Frank Wolf M
Harefuah; 2019 Dec; 158(12):802-806. PubMed ID: 31823535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fonseca MJ; Santos F; Afreixo V; Silva IS; Almeida MDC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Oct; 253():213-219. PubMed ID: 32889327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question].
Rozenberg P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 May; 46(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 29656952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hersh AR; Skeith AE; Sargent JA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):590.e1-590.e10. PubMed ID: 30768934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Darney BG; Snowden JM; Cheng YW; Jacob L; Nicholson JM; Kaimal A; Dublin S; Getahun D; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):761-769. PubMed ID: 24084532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.
Sinkey RG; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Ausbeck E; Subramaniam A; Neely CL; Casey BM; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 31306328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management Differ by Maternal Age.
Hersh AR; Urbanowicz E; Garg B; Schmidt EM; Packer CH; Caughey AB
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1061-e1068. PubMed ID: 36452970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.
Gibbs Pickens CM; Kramer MR; Howards PP; Badell ML; Caughey AB; Hogue CJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29215512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
Kawakita T; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis.
Sotiriadis A; Petousis S; Thilaganathan B; Figueras F; Martins WP; Odibo AO; Dinas K; Hyett J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 53(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 30298532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
