These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19409150)
1. The EndoAssist robotic camera holder as an aid to the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Gilbert JM Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Jul; 91(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 19409150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study. Wagner AA; Varkarakis IM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Su LM Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16844449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aiono S; Gilbert JM; Soin B; Finlay PA; Gordan A Surg Endosc; 2002 Sep; 16(9):1267-70. PubMed ID: 12235507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experiences of using the EndoAssist-robot in surgery. Halín N; Loula P; Aarnio P Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 125():161-3. PubMed ID: 17377257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of laparoscopic colectomy with and without the aid of a robotic camera holder. Merola S; Weber P; Wasielewski A; Ballantyne GH Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2002 Feb; 12(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 12008762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Robotic and telerobotic surgical systems for abdominal surgery]. Córdova Dupeyrat A; Ballantyne GH Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2003; 23(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 12768216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Trinh BB; Hauch AT; Buell JF; Kandil E JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel method to objectively assess robotic assistance in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ngu JC; Teo NZ Int J Med Robot; 2021 Aug; 17(4):e2251. PubMed ID: 33686793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Ballantyne GH Surg Endosc; 2002 Oct; 16(10):1389-402. PubMed ID: 12140630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative effectiveness of human scope assistant versus robotic scope holder in laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Ohmura Y; Suzuki H; Kotani K; Teramoto A Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2206-2216. PubMed ID: 30334160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial experience with the EndoAssist camera-holding robot in laparoscopic urological surgery. Kommu SS; Rimington P; Anderson C; Rané A J Robot Surg; 2007; 1(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 25484949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of human and robotic camera control in laparoscopic biliary and colon surgery. Proske JM; Dagher I; Franco D J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2004 Dec; 14(6):345-8. PubMed ID: 15684779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum: a literature review. Pedraza R; Ramos-Valadez DI; Haas EM Cir Cir; 2011; 79(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 21951893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of task performance of the camera-holder robots EndoAssist and Aesop. Nebot PB; Jain Y; Haylett K; Stone R; McCloy R Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2003 Oct; 13(5):334-8. PubMed ID: 14571171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Image tracking system. A new technique for safe and cost-saving laparoscopic operation]. Niebuhr H; Born O Chirurg; 2000 May; 71(5):580-4. PubMed ID: 10875019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Locally operated assistant manipulators with selectable connection system for robotically assisted laparoscopic solo surgery. Fukui S; Kawai T; Nishizawa Y; Nishikawa A; Nakamura T; Iwamoto N; Horise Y; Masamune K Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2021 Apr; 16(4):683-693. PubMed ID: 33713003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Self-guided robotic camera control for laparoscopic surgery compared with human camera control. Omote K; Feussner H; Ungeheuer A; Arbter K; Wei GQ; Siewert JR; Hirzinger G Am J Surg; 1999 Apr; 177(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 10326852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multipurpose surgical robot as a laparoscope assistant. Nelson CA; Zhang X; Shah BC; Goede MR; Oleynikov D Surg Endosc; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1528-32. PubMed ID: 20039068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preclinical evaluation of the versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access general and colorectal procedures. Morton J; Hardwick RH; Tilney HS; Gudgeon AM; Jah A; Stevens L; Marecik S; Slack M Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2169-2177. PubMed ID: 32405893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of novel robotic camera vs a standard laparoscopic camera. Strong VE; Hogle NJ; Fowler DL Surg Innov; 2005 Dec; 12(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 16424951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]