314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19409341)
1. Long-term soft-tissue response to orthodontic treatment with early cervical headgear--a randomized study.
Virkkula T; Kantomaa T; Julku J; Pirttiniemi P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):586-96. PubMed ID: 19409341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized controlled study of early headgear treatment on occlusal stability--a 13 year follow-up.
Krusinskiene V; Kiuttu P; Julku J; Silvola AS; Kantomaa T; Pirttiniemi P
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 18632838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of early headgear treatment on dental arches and craniofacial morphology: an 8 year report of a randomized study.
Pirttiniemi P; Kantomaa T; Mäntysaari R; Pykäläinen A; Krusinskiene V; Laitala T; Karikko J
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 15961567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment.
Hänggi MP; Teuscher UM; Roos M; Peltomäki TA
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 18974068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soft tissue changes produced by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients.
de Almeida MR; Flores-Mir C; Brandão AG; de Almeida RR; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18575306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement surgery: predictability and long-term outcome.
Mobarak KA; Espeland L; Krogstad O; Lyberg T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):353-67. PubMed ID: 11298309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in the permanent dentition.
Varlik SK; Iscan HN
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 18678761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of adolescents with Hansaplate/headgear. Influence on face in profile and on dentition.
Hansson C; Sköld B; Linder-Aronson S
J Orofac Orthop; 1997 Feb; 58(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 9300836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the effects of Twin Block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile.
Varlik SK; Gültan A; Tümer N
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 18281262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sagittal and vertical changes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion according to the Cetlin method.
Ferro F; Monsurró A; Perillo L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 10935955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
Kaya B; Arman A; Uçkan S; Yazici AC
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A long-term follow-up study of Class II malocclusion correction after treatment with Class II elastics or fixed functional appliances.
Nelson B; Hägg U; Hansen K; Bendeus M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 17920503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
