131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19409345)
1. Comparison of Chinese and US orthodontists' averaged evaluations of "facial attractiveness" from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
Liu Y; Korn EL; Oh HS; Pearson H; Xu TM; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):621-34. PubMed ID: 19409345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. . Facial attractiveness: ranking of end-of-treatment facial photographs by pairs of Chinese and US orthodontists.
Xu TM; Korn EL; Liu Y; Oh HS; Lee KH; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 18617106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies?
Shyagali TR; Chandralekha B; Bhayya DP; Kumar S; Balasubramanyam G
Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19113072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness.
Yu XN; Bai D; Feng X; Liu YH; Chen WJ; Li S; Han GL; Jiang RP; Xu TM
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 26872281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the aesthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need by Swedish orthodontists.
Johansson AM; Follin ME
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Apr; 27(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 15817623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
Akhare PJ; Daga A
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of sagittal and oblique smiling profiles in evaluating facial esthetics.
Yang X; Yi Y; Yang S; Xue C; Wang Y; Chen M; Han X; Bai D
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):532-6. PubMed ID: 25668109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability assessment and correlation analysis of evaluating orthodontic treatment outcome in Chinese patients.
Song GY; Zhao ZH; Ding Y; Bai YX; Wang L; He H; Shen G; Li WR; Baumrind S; Geng Z; Xu TM
Int J Oral Sci; 2014 Mar; 6(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 24136673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric and Perceptometric Comparisons of the Perspectives of Orthodontists, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, and Laypeople of Different Ages and Sexes towards Beauty of Female Jaw Angles (Intergonial Widths and Gonial Heights) on Frontal and Three-Quarter Views.
Moradinejad M; Rekabi A; Ashtiani AH; Atashkar N; Rakhshan V
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():2595662. PubMed ID: 36398071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.
Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Profile preferences of Korean American orthodontic patients and orthodontists.
Park YS; Evans CA; Viana G; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 17009479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System for assessing the treatment outcomes of Chinese patients.
Song GY; Baumrind S; Zhao ZH; Ding Y; Bai YX; Wang L; He H; Shen G; Li WR; Wu WZ; Ren C; Weng XR; Geng Z; Xu TM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 23992811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attractive combinations of female gingival displays, buccal corridor sizes, and facial heights according to orthodontists, dentists, and laypeople of different ages and sexes: a psychometric study.
Niknam O; Yousefi Hafshejani S; Rakhshan V
Head Face Med; 2024 Mar; 20(1):17. PubMed ID: 38459597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-perception of facial esthetics by patients with different profiles compared with assessments of orthodontists and lay people.
Volpato GH; de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Oltramari PVP; Freire Fernandes TM; de Almeida MR; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Dec; 158(6):840-848. PubMed ID: 33256916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rating of facial attractiveness.
Phillips C; Tulloch C; Dann C
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1992 Aug; 20(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 1526107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
