These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19410086)

  • 41. Shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9641148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cross-sectional analysis of root canals prepared with NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel reciprocating files.
    Grande NM; Plotino G; Butti A; Messina F; Pameijer CH; Somma F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jan; 103(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 17178505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Shaping outcomes using two Ni-Ti rotary instruments in simulated canals.
    Giovannone T; Migliau G; Bedini R; Ferrari M; Gallottini L
    Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Apr; 57(4):143-54. PubMed ID: 18427359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials.
    Somma F; Cammarota G; Plotino G; Grande NM; Pameijer CH
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 18358899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
    Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper rotary nickel-titanium instruments in artificial canals with 2 different radii of curvature.
    Inan U; Aydin C; Tunca YM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Dec; 104(6):837-40. PubMed ID: 17904394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An in vitro comparison of canal preparation using two automated rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques.
    Jardine SJ; Gulabivala K
    Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 11307215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effectiveness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria.
    Card SJ; Sigurdsson A; Orstavik D; Trope M
    J Endod; 2002 Nov; 28(11):779-83. PubMed ID: 12470024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals.
    Bahia MG; Buono VT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Aug; 100(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 16037784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
    Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):742-7. PubMed ID: 9487850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of the canal centering ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe Nickel Titanium rotary systems.
    Al-Sudani D; Al-Shahrani S
    J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1198-201. PubMed ID: 17174683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of shaft design on the shaping ability of 3 nickel-titanium rotary systems by means of spiral computerized tomography.
    Versiani MA; Pascon EA; de Sousa CJ; Borges MA; Sousa-Neto MD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 18424117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments.
    Patiño PV; Biedma BM; Liébana CR; Cantatore G; Bahillo JG
    J Endod; 2005 Feb; 31(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 15671822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparison of cyclic fatigue between used and new Mtwo Ni-Ti rotary instruments.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Sorci E; Malagnino VA; Somma F
    Int Endod J; 2006 Sep; 39(9):716-23. PubMed ID: 16916361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Ex vivo study of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques in human primary teeth.
    Kummer TR; Calvo MC; Cordeiro MM; de Sousa Vieira R; de Carvalho Rocha MJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Apr; 105(4):e84-92. PubMed ID: 18329573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.