These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1941016)

  • 1. The case-control design and the assessment of the efficacy of cancer screening.
    Connor RJ; Prorok PC; Weed DL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(11):1215-21. PubMed ID: 1941016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re: Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk level.
    Duffy SW; Smith RA; Tabar L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Nov; 97(22):1703; author reply 1703-4. PubMed ID: 16288125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minor influence of self-selection bias on the effectiveness of breast cancer screening in case-control studies in the Netherlands.
    Paap E; Verbeek A; Puliti D; Broeders M; Paci E
    J Med Screen; 2011; 18(3):142-6. PubMed ID: 22045823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A case-control evaluation of the effect of breast cancer screening in the United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer.
    Moss SM; Summerley ME; Thomas BT; Ellman R; Chamberlain JO
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Aug; 46(4):362-4. PubMed ID: 1431707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitfalls in using case-control studies for the evaluation of the effectiveness of breast screening programmes.
    Autier P; Boniol M
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2013 Sep; 22(5):391-7. PubMed ID: 23263568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of breast cancer service screening programme with a Bayesian approach: mortality analysis in a Finnish region.
    Wu JC; Anttila A; Yen AM; Hakama M; Saarenmaa I; Sarkeala T; Malila N; Auvinen A; Chiu SY; Chen TH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jun; 121(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 19890708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Case-control studies of screening.
    Moss SM
    Int J Epidemiol; 1991 Mar; 20(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 2066205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of mammographic screening of the elderly: a case-referent study in the Nijmegen program in The Netherlands.
    van Dijck JA; Holland R; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Mravunac M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Jun; 86(12):934-8. PubMed ID: 8196083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A remarkable reduction of breast cancer deaths in screened versus unscreened women: a case-referent study.
    Paap E; Holland R; den Heeten GJ; van Schoor G; Botterweck AA; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
    Cancer Causes Control; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1569-73. PubMed ID: 20512656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Efficacy of mass screening for breast cancer; reduction in mortality nationally and abroad].
    Tijmstra TJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1991 Feb; 135(6):242-3. PubMed ID: 2005992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the benefits and harms of screening for breast cancer.
    Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 33(1):56-64; discussion 69-73. PubMed ID: 15075145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Humphrey LL; Helfand M; Chan BK; Woolf SH
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):347-60. PubMed ID: 12204020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Case-control evaluation of breast cancer screening efficacy.
    Friedman DR; Dubin N
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 May; 133(10):974-84. PubMed ID: 2035508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer screening: the effect of self selection for screening on comparisons of randomised controlled trials.
    Richardson A; Wells JE
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 9200056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A case-control study to estimate the impact on breast cancer death of the breast screening programme in Wales.
    Fielder HM; Warwick J; Brook D; Gower-Thomas K; Cuzick J; Monypenny I; Duffy SW
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(4):194-8. PubMed ID: 15563774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical epidemiology and radiology: the need to bridge the gap. Breast screening: a case study.
    Zylak CJ
    Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):607-11. PubMed ID: 1509040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness: the next question for breast cancer screening.
    Harris R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jul; 97(14):1021-3. PubMed ID: 16030293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast-cancer mortality in a non-randomized trial on mammographic screening in women over age 65.
    Van Dijck JA; Verbeek AL; Beex LV; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Mravunac M; Straatman H; Werre JM
    Int J Cancer; 1997 Jan; 70(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 9009155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk level.
    Elmore JG; Reisch LM; Barton MB; Barlow WE; Rolnick S; Harris EL; Herrinton LJ; Geiger AM; Beverly RK; Hart G; Yu O; Greene SM; Weiss NS; Fletcher SW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jul; 97(14):1035-43. PubMed ID: 16030301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Summaries for patients. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):I47. PubMed ID: 12204048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.