These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

648 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19410216)

  • 1. Developing guidelines and maintaining quality in antenatal care.
    Tillett J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(3):238-40. PubMed ID: 19410216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Midwifery Monitor to assess quality in two maternity care systems.
    McCourt C; Beake S
    Pract Midwife; 2001 Feb; 4(2):23-9. PubMed ID: 12026296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A critical appraisal of guidelines for antenatal care: components of care and priorities in prenatal education.
    Hanson L; VandeVusse L; Roberts J; Forristal A
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(6):458-68. PubMed ID: 19879518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk management standards in midwifery are no substitute for personal knowledge and accountability.
    Kenyon C
    Complement Ther Clin Pract; 2009 Nov; 15(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 19880083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development and peer review of evidence-based guidelines to support midwifery led care in labour.
    Spiby H; Munro J
    Midwifery; 2009 Apr; 25(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 17512101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing the midwife-woman relationship through shared decision making and clinical guidelines.
    Freeman LM; Griew K
    Women Birth; 2007 Mar; 20(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17127115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antenatal care.
    Palmer L
    RCM Midwives J; 2002 Mar; 5(3):86. PubMed ID: 11917418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A survey of regional guidelines for intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in women at low obstetric risk.
    Hinsliff SW; Hindley C; Thomson AM
    Midwifery; 2004 Dec; 20(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 15571883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current resources for evidence-based practice January/February 2005.
    Sakala C
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2005; 50(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 15637516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The development of national competency standards for the midwife in Australia.
    Homer CS; Passant L; Kildea S; Pincombe J; Thorogood C; Leap N; Brodie PM
    Midwifery; 2007 Dec; 23(4):350-60. PubMed ID: 17125891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Estonia ardently desires renewal of childbirth care practice].
    Valvanne L
    Katilolehti; 1990 Aug; 95(5):14-20. PubMed ID: 2077236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shared antenatal care.
    McIntyre HD
    Aust Fam Physician; 2003 Jun; 32(6):390; author reply 390-1. PubMed ID: 12833755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of community maternal care performance of public health midwives of a province in Sri Lanka: a multi-method approach.
    Gunathunga W; Fernando DN
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2000 Jun; 31(2):310-8. PubMed ID: 11127332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in quality of antenatal care provided by midwives to low-risk pregnant dutch women in different ethnic groups.
    Choté A; de Groot C; Redekop K; Hoefman R; Koopmans G; Jaddoe V; Hofman A; Steegers E; Trappenburg M; Mackenbach J; Foets M
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2012; 57(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 22954076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guidelines on anaemia: effect on primary-care midwives in The Netherlands.
    Offerhaus P; Fleuren M; Wensing M
    Midwifery; 2005 Sep; 21(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 16055242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based medicine and practice guidelines: application to genetics.
    Toriello HV; Goldenberg P
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2009 Aug; 151C(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 19621463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evidence-based midwifery practice in Scotland: a discussion of the problems].
    Fleming V; Poat A; Pender U
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2002 Dec; 96(10):677-81. PubMed ID: 12611055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing a review process for Australian midwives: a report of the midwifery practice review project process.
    Griffiths M; Homer C
    Women Birth; 2008 Sep; 21(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 18619935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing a tool to appraise fetal monitoring guidelines for women at low obstetric risk.
    Hindley C; Hinsliff SW; Thomson AM
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Nov; 52(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 16194184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Antenatal care in Norway--many unnecessary check ups].
    Backe B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Aug; 122(20):1989-92. PubMed ID: 12555444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.