These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1941028)

  • 1. A randomized controlled trial comparing quantitative informed consent formats.
    Simel DL; Feussner JR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(8):771-7. PubMed ID: 1941028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Getting meaningful informed consent from older adults: a structured literature review of empirical research.
    Sugarman J; McCrory DC; Hubal RC
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1998 Apr; 46(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 9560079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of two formats of informed consent on knowledge amongst persons with advanced HIV disease in a clinical trial of didanosine.
    Tindall B; Forde S; Ross MW; Goldstein D; Barker S; Cooper DA
    Patient Educ Couns; 1994 Dec; 24(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 7753719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do cancer patients fully understand clinical trial participation? A pilot study to assess informed consent and patient expectations.
    Wray RJ; Stryker JE; Winer E; Demetri G; Emmons KM
    J Cancer Educ; 2007; 22(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 17570804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing two methods for delivering clinical trial informed consent information to older adults: singular versus stepped approach.
    O'Hare F; Flanagan Z; Nelson M; Curtis A; Heritier S; Spark S; Zoungas S
    Clin Trials; 2018 Dec; 15(6):610-615. PubMed ID: 30074410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials.
    Daugherty CK; Ratain MJ; Minami H; Banik DM; Vogelzang NJ; Stadler WM; Siegler M
    J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jul; 16(7):2305-12. PubMed ID: 9667244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
    Coyne CA; Xu R; Raich P; Plomer K; Dignan M; Wenzel LB; Fairclough D; Habermann T; Schnell L; Quella S; Cella D;
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Mar; 21(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 12610182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of repeated testing upon comprehension of informed consent materials by elderly volunteers.
    Taub HA; Baker MT
    Exp Aging Res; 1983; 9(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 6641771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How informed is online informed consent?
    Varnhagen CK; Gushta M; Daniels J; Peters TC; Parmar N; Law D; Hirsch R; Takach BS; Johnson T
    Ethics Behav; 2005; 15(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 16127857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research.
    Ogloff JR; Otto RK
    Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):239-52. PubMed ID: 11651140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing comprehension of information for informed consent: ethical implications for nursing research.
    Silva MC; Sorrell JM
    Int J Nurs Stud; 1984; 21(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 6569032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: informed consent.
    Brody JL; Gluck JP; Aragon AS
    Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(4):285-98. PubMed ID: 11655335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized controlled trial of an electronic informed consent process.
    Rothwell E; Wong B; Rose NC; Anderson R; Fedor B; Stark LA; Botkin JR
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):1-7. PubMed ID: 25747685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A grounded theory study of the informed consent process for pharmacologic research.
    Nusbaum JG; Chenitz WC
    West J Nurs Res; 1990 Apr; 12(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 2321375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent: assessment of comprehension.
    Wirshing DA; Wirshing WC; Marder SR; Liberman RP; Mintz J
    Am J Psychiatry; 1998 Nov; 155(11):1508-11. PubMed ID: 9812110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying components in consent information needed to support informed decision making about trial participation: An interview study with women managing cancer.
    Abhyankar P; Velikova G; Summers B; Bekker HL
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 Jul; 161():83-91. PubMed ID: 27261532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Patient-Centered Approach to Informed Consent: Results from a Survey and Randomized Trial.
    Krishnamurti T; Argo N
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Aug; 36(6):726-40. PubMed ID: 26964877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Barriers to obtaining consent in dementia research: implications for surrogate decision-making.
    Baskin SA; Morris J; Ahronheim JC; Meier DE; Morrison RS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1998 Mar; 46(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 9514373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: a review and critique of the empirical studies.
    Meisel A; Roth LH
    Ariz Law Rev; 1983; 25(2):265-346. PubMed ID: 11658677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.