These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1941037)

  • 21. Statistical vs clinical significance in product testing: can they be designed to satisfy equivalence?
    Kingman A
    J Public Health Dent; 1992; 52(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 1432923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Practical experience with the design and analysis of a three-armed equivalence study.
    Lange S; Freitag G; Trampisch HJ
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1998 Sep; 54(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 9832295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Practical guide to sample size calculations: non-inferiority and equivalence trials.
    Flight L; Julious SA
    Pharm Stat; 2016; 15(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 26604186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Equivalence and noninferiority testing in regression models and repeated-measures designs.
    Mascha EJ; Sessler DI
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Mar; 112(3):678-87. PubMed ID: 21304155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Equivalence trials: methodologic analysis.
    Carneiro A
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1125-39. PubMed ID: 14655314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Equivalence approaches.
    Williams RL; Chen ML; Hauck WW
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2002 Sep; 72(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 12235443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Equivalence and noninferiority in anaesthesia research.
    Myles PS
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2010 Jul; 38(4):621-2. PubMed ID: 20715723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Active control equivalence trials: some methodological aspects.
    Ferner U; Neumann N
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1992; 106 Suppl():S93-5. PubMed ID: 1546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The principle of equivalence reconsidered: assessing the relevance of the principle of equivalence in prison medicine.
    Jotterand F; Wangmo T
    Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(7):4-12. PubMed ID: 24978402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Design of biological equivalence programs for therapeutic biotechnology products in clinical development: a perspective.
    Mordenti J; Cavagnaro JA; Green JD
    Pharm Res; 1996 Oct; 13(10):1427-37. PubMed ID: 8899831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials.
    Christensen E
    J Hepatol; 2007 May; 46(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 17412447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Methods in equivalence and non-inferiority trials].
    Christensen E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Sep; 170(38):2977-9. PubMed ID: 18808753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The problem of therapeutic equivalence with paired qualitative data: an example from a clinical trial using haemophiliacs with an inhibitor to factor VIII.
    Lee ML; Lusher JM
    Stat Med; 1991 Mar; 10(3):433-41. PubMed ID: 1902967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Logical and analytic issues in dental/oral product comparison research.
    Imrey PB
    J Periodontal Res; 1992 Jul; 27(4 Pt 2):328-41; disc 349-51, 356-7, 362-3. PubMed ID: 1507021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Similar, the same or just not different: a guide for deciding whether treatments are clinically equivalent. [Dept. of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Univ. of Western Ontario, London, Ontario].
    Massel D
    Can J Cardiol; 1999 May; 15(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 10350665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The scope and requirements related to preclinical and clinical studies of a new medicinal product, including biotechnological and biosimilar products.
    Brodniewicz-Proba T
    Acta Pol Pharm; 2008; 65(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 19172845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Bayesian equivalency test for two independent binomial proportions.
    Kawasaki Y; Shimokawa A; Yamada H; Miyaoka E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(4):781-9. PubMed ID: 26322683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stopping rules for clinical trials incorporating clinical opinion.
    Freedman LS; Lowe D; Macaskill P
    Biometrics; 1984 Sep; 40(3):575-86. PubMed ID: 6518241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Non-inferiority and equivalence trials: Key methodological issues].
    Herr M; Descatha A; Aegerter P
    Rev Med Interne; 2018 May; 39(5):352-359. PubMed ID: 28693836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Exact, conditional, and predictive power in planning clinical trials.
    Moussa MA
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Dec; 10(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 2691205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.